IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nas/journl/v115y2018p4375-4380.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Neural precursors of future liking and affective reciprocity

Author

Listed:
  • Noam Zerubavel

    (Center for Science and Society, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027; Interdisciplinary Center for Innovative Theory and Empirics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027)

  • Mark Anthony Hoffman

    (Interdisciplinary Center for Innovative Theory and Empirics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027; Department of Sociology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027)

  • Adam Reich

    (Interdisciplinary Center for Innovative Theory and Empirics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027; Department of Sociology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027)

  • Kevin N. Ochsner

    (Department of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027)

  • Peter Bearman

    (Interdisciplinary Center for Innovative Theory and Empirics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027; Department of Sociology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027)

Abstract

Why do certain group members end up liking each other more than others? How does affective reciprocity arise in human groups? The prediction of interpersonal sentiment has been a long-standing pursuit in the social sciences. We combined fMRI and longitudinal social network data to test whether newly acquainted group members’ reward-related neural responses to images of one another’s faces predict their future interpersonal sentiment, even many months later. Specifically, we analyze associations between relationship-specific valuation activity and relationship-specific future liking. We found that one’s own future (T2) liking of a particular group member is predicted jointly by actor’s initial (T1) neural valuation of partner and by that partner’s initial (T1) neural valuation of actor. These actor and partner effects exhibited equivalent predictive strength and were robust when statistically controlling for each other, both individuals’ initial liking, and other potential drivers of liking. Behavioral findings indicated that liking was initially unreciprocated at T1 yet became strongly reciprocated by T2. The emergence of affective reciprocity was partly explained by the reciprocal pathways linking dyad members’ T1 neural data both to their own and to each other’s T2 liking outcomes. These findings elucidate interpersonal brain mechanisms that define how we ultimately end up liking particular interaction partners, how group members’ initially idiosyncratic sentiments become reciprocated, and more broadly, how dyads evolve. This study advances a flexible framework for researching the neural foundations of interpersonal sentiments and social relations that—conceptually, methodologically, and statistically—emphasizes group members’ neural interdependence.

Suggested Citation

  • Noam Zerubavel & Mark Anthony Hoffman & Adam Reich & Kevin N. Ochsner & Peter Bearman, 2018. "Neural precursors of future liking and affective reciprocity," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 115(17), pages 4375-4380, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:nas:journl:v:115:y:2018:p:4375-4380
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.pnas.org/content/115/17/4375.full
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mastroianni, Adam M. & Cooney, Gus & Boothby, Erica J. & Reece, Andrew G., 2021. "The liking gap in groups and teams," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 109-122.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nas:journl:v:115:y:2018:p:4375-4380. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eric Cain (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.pnas.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.