IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mve/journl/v48y2022i2p1-27.html

Auction Winners, Bid Price Endogeneity and Customer Preferences for Bison and Beef

Author

Listed:
  • Scott F. Fausti

    (California State University, Monterey Bay)

  • Angel F. Gonzalez

    (California State University, Monterey Bay)

  • Bashir Qasmi

    (South Dakota State University)

  • Keith Underwood

    (South Dakota State University)

Abstract

We conduct a ground beef versus ground bison consumer preference study. A panel of 91 participants were asked first to blindly sample ground 93% lean bison, 80% lean beef, and 93% lean beef, and report their preferences for each meat's qualities, such as, juiciness and tenderness. Participants were then given the option of participating in a multiproduct, second-price auction

Suggested Citation

  • Scott F. Fausti & Angel F. Gonzalez & Bashir Qasmi & Keith Underwood, 2022. "Auction Winners, Bid Price Endogeneity and Customer Preferences for Bison and Beef," Journal of Economic Insight, Missouri Valley Economic Association, vol. 48(2), pages 1-27.
  • Handle: RePEc:mve:journl:v:48:y:2022:i:2:p:1-27
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • C36 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Instrumental Variables (IV) Estimation
    • C57 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Econometrics of Games and Auctions
    • D12 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
    • D44 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - Auctions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mve:journl:v:48:y:2022:i:2:p:1-27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Cullen Goenner (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mveaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.