IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using the principle of equal sacrifice to evaluate a tax reform


  • Simone Pellegrino


The empirical studies evaluating the effects of personal income taxation draw their conclusions from the use of the standard statistical and redistributive indexes. Nevertheless, the Economic theory has elaborated some precise axioms to equally apportion the burden of taxation among citizens: in fact, the principle of equal sacrifice can give normative and positive contents to the ability-to-pay principle. Therefore, the purpose is to find a link between this principle and the tax progressivity: this is the only way to verify if the Personal Income Tax, as applied over the world, is consistent with Mill's approach, which has to be considered as the ultimate principle of taxation. This paper aims at discussing this main goal, first by analysing the recent theoretical outcomes and then by testing the possibility of stating that the Italian lawmaker adopts a precise criterion of distributive justice and a particular Social Welfare Function when he determines vertical equity and modifications in the Personal Income Tax structure.

Suggested Citation

  • Simone Pellegrino, 2008. "Using the principle of equal sacrifice to evaluate a tax reform," Politica economica, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 2, pages 211-234.
  • Handle: RePEc:mul:je8794:doi:10.1429/27917:y:2008:i:2:p:211-234

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Morini, Matteo & Pellegrino, Simone, 2018. "Personal income tax reforms: A genetic algorithm approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(3), pages 994-1004.


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:je8794:doi:10.1429/27917:y:2008:i:2:p:211-234. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: . General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.