IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Using the principle of equal sacrifice to evaluate a tax reform

Listed author(s):
  • Pellegrino Simone

The empirical studies evaluating the effects of personal income taxation draw their conclusions from the use of the standard statistical and redistributive indexes. Nevertheless, the Economic theory has elaborated some precise axioms to equally apportion the burden of taxation among citizens: in fact, the principle of equal sacrifice can give normative and positive contents to the ability-to-pay principle. Therefore, the purpose is to find a link between this principle and the tax progressivity: this is the only way to verify if the Personal Income Tax, as applied over the world, is consistent with Mill's approach, which has to be considered as the ultimate principle of taxation. This paper aims at discussing this main goal, first by analysing the recent theoretical outcomes and then by testing the possibility of stating that the Italian lawmaker adopts a precise criterion of distributive justice and a particular Social Welfare Function when he determines vertical equity and modifications in the Personal Income Tax structure.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by Società editrice il Mulino in its journal Politica economica.

Volume (Year): (2008)
Issue (Month): 2 ()
Pages: 211-234

in new window

Handle: RePEc:mul:je8794:doi:10.1429/27917:y:2008:i:2:p:211-234
Contact details of provider: Web page:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:je8794:doi:10.1429/27917:y:2008:i:2:p:211-234. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.