IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reputazione come credibilità per comportamenti passati nei contratti tra acquirente e fornitore di servizi sanitari


  • Marcello Montefiori


Because of information asymmetry the purchaser is generally unable to verify the cost reducing effort and the true quality of health services. Thus the purchaser needs to negotiate appropriate contract terms to get the desired levels for the variables of interest. The trade off between quality and cost reducing effort has already been stated by a number of articles: a higher quality implies higher production costs and vice versa. This paper shows that if the principal (purchaser) can observe the quality provided by the agent, then the reputation based on the reliability of past behaviour gains a role. The proposed model, studying the hospital's profit function, uses reputation to overcome the asymmetric information in contracts for health care services. The goal is to show that reputation for past behaviour contract terms induces the provider to offer the target level for quality at the minimum cost. In particular the model highlights that, even if the purchaser is unable to observe perfectly the quality, a long-run first best equilibrium outcome is attainable, provided he sets, with a believable threat, the enforcement of fair conduct greater or, at least, equal to the temptation to cheat.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcello Montefiori, 2004. "Reputazione come credibilità per comportamenti passati nei contratti tra acquirente e fornitore di servizi sanitari," Politica economica, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 1, pages 89-116.
  • Handle: RePEc:mul:je8794:doi:10.1429/12922:y:2004:i:1:p:89-116

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:je8794:doi:10.1429/12922:y:2004:i:1:p:89-116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.