Opening the "Skill-Biased Technological Change" Black Box: A Look at the Microfoundations of the Technology-Skill Relationship
The present article is a review of the recent empirical literature developed around the issues of why technology is complementary to high levels - and substitute for low levels - of skill, and, in particular, of how the adoption of ICT and computer-based machines has changed the skill requirements of jobs. During the last two decades the discussion around the impact of technological diffusion on the skill mix of employees has been intense. On this purpose, different approaches have developed that provide different evidence to a common research question. The paper shows that traditional studies have just inferred the skill-biased technical change hypothesis by employing broad measures of technological change and human skills from sector- and firm-level data. While studies that rely on worker-level data depict a more puzzling phenomenon, a recent literature based on job-level analyses focuses the heterogeneity of both technology and skills and aims at determining the demand for labor by the tasks that occupations require. The main conclusion is that technology is a partial substitute for repetitive manual tasks, and a complement of nonroutine, non-manual skills, for which more educated workers enjoy a comparative advantage. However, some open questions still remain that claim a deeper and multidisciplinary investigation on the endogenous relationship between technology adoption and general versus specific skill accumulation.
Volume (Year): (2007)
Issue (Month): 3 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| |
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:jb33yl:doi:10.1428/25821:y:2007:i:3:p:451-476. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.