IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mul/j0hje1/doi10.1430-24254y2007i1p39-60.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Structural Aspects of the Beer Market in Germany and in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • William James Adams

Abstract

Between 1950 and 2000, the four-firm producer-concentration ratio for beer increased from 22 to 95 in the United States; and Anheuser-Busch's share of domestic output ballooned from 6 to 54 percent. In the same period, the four-firm producer-concentration ratio in Germany has risen, but it remains low (in 2000, it was just 29). In 2005, after five years of important mergers involving big brewers, the German beer industry was still much less concentrated than its American counterpart. In this article, we discuss several candidate explanations for the failure of beer-producer-concentration to rise as much in Germany as in the United States: the relevance of the new technologies to German brewers, the preferences of German consumers, the rules for advertising on German television and other factors, largely absent from the consensus interpretation of American experience. We show that market structure depends on a remarkably broad range of factors, extending well beyond technological opportunity and market size emphasized by Bain.

Suggested Citation

  • William James Adams, 2007. "Structural Aspects of the Beer Market in Germany and in the United States," L'industria, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 1, pages 39-60.
  • Handle: RePEc:mul:j0hje1:doi:10.1430/24254:y:2007:i:1:p:39-60
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1430/24254
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1430/24254
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:j0hje1:doi:10.1430/24254:y:2007:i:1:p:39-60. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.