IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mth/hrr888/v2y2018i1p95-106.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Work-Family Conflict and Turnover Intentions: Moderated Mediation Model

Author

Listed:
  • Aleena Syed
  • Muhammad Bilal Ahmad
  • Hafiz Fawad Ali
  • Mian Muhammad Arif
  • Amna Gohar

Abstract

In this research, the relationship between work-family conflicts of female doctors with turnover intentions is examined along with the moderating role of perceived organizational support and taking job stress as a mediator. A self-administered questionnaire was used to collect data from 270 female doctors who were practicing in different tertiary care hospitals of Lahore. For analyzing the data, the researcher used IBM SPSS and PLS-SEM. Results of the study confirmed that a positive relationship exists between WFC and intention to quit jobs in female doctors. Results also revealed that POS acts as a moderator between WFC and quit intentions but rejected the hypothesis of stress as a mediator between work-family conflict and intentions to leave the profession in the case of female doctors of Lahore. The past studies on work-family conflict were mostly conducted on the scenario of western countries particularly in America but the present study gives an insight of the relationship between work-family conflict and turnover intention of female doctors in Pakistan.

Suggested Citation

  • Aleena Syed & Muhammad Bilal Ahmad & Hafiz Fawad Ali & Mian Muhammad Arif & Amna Gohar, 2018. "Work-Family Conflict and Turnover Intentions: Moderated Mediation Model," Human Resource Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 2(1), pages 95-106, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:mth:hrr888:v:2:y:2018:i:1:p:95-106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/hrr/article/view/13925
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/hrr/article/view/13925
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mth:hrr888:v:2:y:2018:i:1:p:95-106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Technical Support Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/hrr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.