Author
Abstract
This paper analyzes institutional restructuring to interpret the governance vision of the Xi Jinping administration and examine its challenges. The Xi administration aims to build a strong state by ensuring the rule by law, strengthening central authority in key national policy areas such as taxation and finance, and overcoming the inefficiencies of the bureaucratic system. At the same time, it seeks to reduce the bloated bureaucracy and establish a governance system suited to a market economy. Additionally, to prevent internal discord within the administration caused by painful reforms and to suppress potential regime threats from both domestic and foreign actors, Xi has placed trusted allies in key positions in propaganda, public security, and the military, enforcing a highly authoritarian rule. While this approach demonstrates a strong sense of purpose and high execution capacity, it also carries significant risks. One major risk is the potential failure of governance due to excessive authoritarianism, which could hinder free policy discussions and the utilization of expert knowledge, ultimately leading to policy missteps. Another challenge is the risk of stagnation and disorder within the governance apparatus, as institutional restructuring may disrupt the internal balance within the Party and government, complicating personnel management and policy execution. Furthermore, the absence of a clear successor to Xi Jinping raises concerns about the stability of leadership transition in the post-Xi era, creating uncertainty regarding the continuity of governance reforms. The success or failure of the Xi administration’s governance reforms will largely depend on how effectively it can manage these risks while maintaining political stability and economic governance.
Suggested Citation
Kojima Kazuko, 2025.
"Xi Jinping's Governance Vision as Reflected in Institutional Restructuring,"
Public Policy Review, Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Finance Japan, vol. 21(3), pages 1-25, October.
Handle:
RePEc:mof:journl:ppr21_03_03
DOI: 10.57520/prippr.21-3-3
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mof:journl:ppr21_03_03. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Policy Research Institute (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/prigvjp.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.