IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mof/journl/ppr19_01_02.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reducing the Tendency for Over- and Under-Provision of Health Services at the Point of Care: The Roles of Evidence-Based Medical Education and the Patient-Centered Clinical Method

Author

Listed:
  • Ryuki Kassai

    (Professor, Department of Community and Family Medicine, Fukushima Medical University)

  • Masako Ii

    (Professor, Graduate School of Economics, Hitotsubashi University; Professor, School of International and Public Policy, Hitotsubashi University)

Abstract

In order to reduce ever-increasing social security expenditure, the Government of Japan is attempting to improve the efficiency of healthcare services. The premise of these efforts is that there exists a high degree of waste in the present system. However, the problem lies not only in over-provision of health care, but also extends to under-provision. To redress over- and under-provision of healthcare services and promote the right care, it is necessary to gain the awareness of and secure action from healthcare providers, users, and government officials. Because this is an area that involves human cognition and the modification of behavior, it is not a simple task. However, many other countries have been tackling this problem of low-value care through trial and error. Three forces that govern the de-adoption of low-value care have been previously described: evidence that a current practice provides little or no value, eminence that comes from professional societies issuing practice guidelines or recommendations against a low-value service, and economics (financial incentives) that can be used to catalyze de-adoption. In addition, education for primary health care professionals is important to enable them to fully understand the patient-centered clinical method and to implement it within their healthcare practice by taking users’ emotions and the cost-effectiveness of care into consideration. By following the examples of other countries’ efforts to reduce over- and under-provision in their respective healthcare systems, considerable fiscal benefits can be expected in Japan. This paper revisits the definitions of medical screening, examines over- and under-provision of health care by taking lung cancer screening as an example, introduces overseas attempts to de-adopt low-value care, and outlines the patient-centered clinical method.

Suggested Citation

  • Ryuki Kassai & Masako Ii, 2023. "Reducing the Tendency for Over- and Under-Provision of Health Services at the Point of Care: The Roles of Evidence-Based Medical Education and the Patient-Centered Clinical Method," Public Policy Review, Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Finance Japan, vol. 19(1), pages 1-26, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:mof:journl:ppr19_01_02
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mof.go.jp/english/pri/publication/pp_review/ppr19_01_02.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    over-provision; under-provision; right care; low-value care; medical screening; primary care; primary health care; evidence-based medicine (EBM); patient-centered clinical method;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H51 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Government Expenditures and Health
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
    • I19 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mof:journl:ppr19_01_02. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Policy Research Institute (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/prigvjp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.