IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mof/journl/ppr19_01_01.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Over- and Under-Provision of Diabetes Screening: Making More Efficient Use of Healthcare Resources

Author

Listed:
  • Kazumitsu Nawata

    (Specially Appointed Professor, Hitotsubashi Institute for Advanced Study, Hitotsubashi University)

  • Masako Ii

    (Professor, Graduate School of Economics, Hitotsubashi University; Professor, School of International and Public Policy, Hitotsubashi University)

  • Ryuki Kassai

    (Professor, Department of Community and Family Medicine, Fukushima Medical University)

Abstract

National medical care expenditure in Japan exceeded 43 trillion yen in FY2018, with over 1.2 trillion yen of this total being spent on diabetes care. The sales of diabetes drugs continue to increase by several percent every year, and in FY2020 were second only to anti-cancer drugs. Even with such huge healthcare and drug expenditure on the treatment of diabetes, the number of patients undergoing dialysis due to diabetes continues to increase, and the number of chronic dialysis patients in Japan per capita was shown to be by far the largest in an international comparison. At the end of 2020, there were 275.4 dialysis patients per 100,000 people in Japan, of which 39.5% of chronic dialysis patients had diabetic nephropathy, in which the kidneys are damaged due to diabetes. A previous analysis of the length of hospitalization for diabetes patients in Japan showed that the average number of days spent in hospital was extremely long, with a cost-benefit analysis indicating that this is difficult to justify. The results of the data analysis carried out in this paper suggest that many people suffering from severe diabetes may not actually be receiving treatment. In contrast with the major diabetes screening programs overseas, it is clear that the Japanese program (1) does not evaluate the risk of developing diabetes, although it does include an age limit; (2) carries out annual screening regardless of the risk and/or blood sugar level; and (3) is not updated by the best available evidence from the latest clinical research. Many stakeholders, including local governments, health insurance associations, and the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, have already pointed out the importance of preventing diabetes aggravation. In this paper, we explore the reasons why Japan’s efforts to encourage people at high risk to receive preventive medical care are failing, and propose necessary measures to achieve organic cooperation between screening programs and healthcare provision.

Suggested Citation

  • Kazumitsu Nawata & Masako Ii & Ryuki Kassai, 2023. "Over- and Under-Provision of Diabetes Screening: Making More Efficient Use of Healthcare Resources," Public Policy Review, Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Finance Japan, vol. 19(1), pages 1-36, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:mof:journl:ppr19_01_01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mof.go.jp/english/pri/publication/pp_review/ppr19_01_01.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    diabetes; educational hospitalization; screening;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C13 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Estimation: General
    • H51 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Government Expenditures and Health
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mof:journl:ppr19_01_01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Policy Research Institute (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/prigvjp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.