IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mhr/finarc/urndoi10.1628-fa-2026-0002.html

Decade of Reflections on the First OECD BEPS Program: Salvation or Condemnation for Financial Transactions?

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Druga
  • Maria Zvonarjova

Abstract

The examination of the OECD BEPS initiative, particularly Actions 4 and 8-10, reveals positive strides in the realm of international tax regulation aimed at curbing base erosion and ensuring that multinational companies' profits are aligned with where value is created. Action 4 introduced limitations on interest deductions, while Actions 8-10 brought updates to transfer pricing rules, emphasizing economic substance. Although there has been significant progress, there remain complexities, such as heightened compliance requirements and intricate tax issues, highlighted by the subtleties in the Dutch system and exemplary treatment of cash pooling. The analysis underscores the need for a balance between theoretical tax models and their practical application within business operations, suggesting ongoing revisions to international standards to maintain equitable and effective tax systems. As local tax regulations, including the Dutch transfer pricing landscape, continue to adapt through initiatives like BEPS 2.0, there is an encouragement for the OECD to further refine its guidelines to ensure they are both pragmatic and equitable.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Druga & Maria Zvonarjova, 2025. "Decade of Reflections on the First OECD BEPS Program: Salvation or Condemnation for Financial Transactions?," FinanzArchiv: Public Finance Analysis, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 81(3), pages 299-332.
  • Handle: RePEc:mhr:finarc:urn:doi:10.1628/fa-2026-0002
    DOI: 10.1628/fa-2026-0002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mohrsiebeck.com/en/article/decade-of-reflections-on-the-first-oecd-beps-program-salvation-or-condemnation-for-financial-transactions-101628fa-2026-0002
    Download Restriction: Fulltext access is included for subscribers to the printed version.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1628/fa-2026-0002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • H20 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - General
    • K34 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Tax Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mhr:finarc:urn:doi:10.1628/fa-2026-0002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Wolpert (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mohrsiebeck.com/fa .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.