IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mgs/iojome/v2y2022i3p16-22.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Relevance of Enterprise Risk Management Methodologies to European Project Funding Calls: The Case of Grant “Performance and Excellence in the Field of Environment and Renewable Energy through Modern Cluster Entitiesâ€

Author

Listed:
  • Adriana Ioana Bebeselea-Sterp

    (Faculty of Economics, Ioan Slavici University, Timisoara, Romania)

  • Bogdan Cotlet

    (Faculty of Economics, Ioan Slavici University, Timisoara, Romania)

  • Mircea Untaru

    (Faculty of Economics, Ioan Slavici University, Timisoara, Romania)

  • Diana Raluca Diaconescu

    (Faculty of Economics, Ioan Slavici University, Timisoara, Romania)

  • Anamaria Stingaciu

    (Faculty of Economics, Ioan Slavici University, Timisoara, Romania)

  • Diana Cozmiuc

    (Faculty of Economics, Ioan Slavici University, Timisoara, Romania)

Abstract

Capital providers, such as shareholders on capital markets or European funding providers, are interested in the net present value of discounted cash flow and the risks or opportunities that may contribute to financial planning in a negative or positive way. Since the Sarbanes Oxley act, corporations listed on US capital markets are demanded to practice enterprise risk management. There are several methodologies in place: the COSO framework, ISO 31 0000, RIMs Risk Maturity. These are holistic approaches to risk management in all business aspects, with a designated methodology. This methodology will be the scholarly literature review in this article, whose goal to elaborate the reference enterprise risk management methodologies and their relevance in empirical data analysis, European project funding calls. European projects demand risk management and mitigation, but do not offer a reference framework to do this. The article purposes to make European funds easy to understand as their requirements are explained and the most suitable scientific solution is sought. The methodology is a descriptive case study, with instrumental value. Findings are that funding authorities, be they capital markets or public funds, benefit highly in their decisions by the integration of opportunities and risks. The research concerns the suitability of enterprise risk management with European funds, and the conclusion of a perfect match confirms theory, brings it new scope, and may be of high practical use as for the coherent and timely documentation of European project funding calls.

Suggested Citation

  • Adriana Ioana Bebeselea-Sterp & Bogdan Cotlet & Mircea Untaru & Diana Raluca Diaconescu & Anamaria Stingaciu & Diana Cozmiuc, 2022. "The Relevance of Enterprise Risk Management Methodologies to European Project Funding Calls: The Case of Grant “Performance and Excellence in the Field of Environment and Renewable Energy through Mo," International Journal of Operations Management, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 2(3), pages 16-22, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:mgs:iojome:v:2:y:2022:i:3:p:16-22
    DOI: 10.18775/ijom.2757-0509.2020.23.4002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://researchleap.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/02_The-Relevance-of-Enterprise-Risk-Management-Methodologies-to-European-Project-Funding-Calls.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://researchleap.com/the-relevance-of-enterprise-risk-management-methodologies-to-european-project-funding-calls/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18775/ijom.2757-0509.2020.23.4002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Certain Environment; High Risk Environment; Uncertain Environment; Net Present Value of Discounted Cash Flow; Real Options Valuation; Enterprise Risk Management; Coso; Rims; Positive or Negative Impact on Cash Flow; Risk Mitigation; Sustainability;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M00 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - General - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mgs:iojome:v:2:y:2022:i:3:p:16-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bojan Obrenovic (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://researchleap.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.