Author
Listed:
- Hartmut Kainer
(Erasmus University of Applied Sciences, Management Department, Basel, Switzerland)
- Knut Linke
(Erasmus University of Applied Sciences, Management Department, Basel, Switzerland)
- Susan Omondi
(Erasmus University of Applied Sciences, Management Department, Basel, Switzerland)
- Thomas Schwendener
(Erasmus University of Applied Sciences, Management Department, Basel, Switzerland)
Abstract
The present study was a snapshot of the status of quality management in the DACH region. As part of a survey of 229 executives and employees as well as independent consultants, the current state of quality management was investigated. Basically, it can be said that quality management is largely integrated into the companies, with a few exceptions. The majority of the companies use the standardized method of ISO EN 9001:2015, a considerable proportion use the EFQM method, which places great emphasis on the deductible and assessment. The big difference among the companies surveyed is the lived “spirit” of quality management. It is predominantly reported that the companies have a functioning quality management system; however, many report that there is great potential for improvement in the design and use. Here quality management is often seen as a necessary evil because the certificates are needed for the customers. Quality management is seen as a compulsory exercise and not as a facilitator for innovations and continuous improvement. Business excellence – in the freestyle – is a foreign word. The only remedy is a reflection on a desired reflection on future-oriented business excellence. In order to achieve this, both a reengineering of the business processes and a changed mindset and leadership of the executives and the employees involved must find their way into the company.
Suggested Citation
Hartmut Kainer & Knut Linke & Susan Omondi & Thomas Schwendener, 2022.
"Quality Management quo Vadis: A Snapshot of the German Quality Management Environment,"
International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 8(6), pages 44-53, September.
Handle:
RePEc:mgs:ijmsba:v:8:y:2022:i:6:p:44-53
DOI: 10.18775/ijmsba.1849-5664-5419.2014.86.1005
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- M00 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - General - - - General
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mgs:ijmsba:v:8:y:2022:i:6:p:44-53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bojan Obrenovic (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://researchleap.com/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.