IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mfa/journl/v32y2024i2p69-83.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Profitability, Inventory Intensity and Corporate Tax Avoidance in Nigeria: The Moderating Effect of Institutional Ownership

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmad Haruna Abubakar

    (Department of Accounting and Finance, Faculty of Business Management and Professional Studies, Management and Science University, Malaysia.)

  • Azam Abdelhakeem Khalid Ahmed

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, University Malaysia Sarawak, Malaysia.)

  • Rossazana Ab Rahim

    (Department of Accounting and Finance, College of Administration and Economics, Lebanese French University, Iraq.)

  • Znar Nahro Ahmed

    (Department of Accounting and Finance, College of Administration and Economics, Lebanese French University, Iraq.)

Abstract

Research Question: This paper examines whether the presence of institutional investors can moderate the association between profitability on corporate tax avoidance. Motivation: The motivation behind this study is that corporate tax avoidance practices have become a major concern for the government globally because it’s negatively affects revenue generation. Similarly in Nigeria, despite the tax law reform which aims to eliminate unclear and conflicting element in the tax provision, tax avoidance activities continue to occur. Such can be seen from the recent cases of Multichoice, MRS and Chevron. Idea: The core idea of this research is to examine the moderating role of institutional investors on the relationship between profitability and corporate tax avoidance. Data: Data for this study were obtained from the financial statement of the listed firms in Nigeria, accessed through Thompson Reuters DataStream, as well as from their annual reports for five years (2018-2022). Method/Tools: Panel Corrected Standard Error is employed to analyse the data. Findings: The results reveal that despite the negative effect of profitability on effective tax rate, the presence of institutional investors would provide efficient monitoring and reduce tax fraud and manipulation in the firm. Also, the results indicate that high inventory intensity in a company is linked to the significant cost of goods sold, leading to reduced profits. Consequently, lower profits result in lower company taxes, which in turn reduces the effective tax rate. Contributions: Therefore, the study provide evidence to support the long-term institutional investors have the knowledge, capability, and resources to inspect managers and exercise control on them. Also, the results of this study will also provide the Nigerian tax authority with useful information and empirical support, the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) should put in place strict measures to reduce aggressive use of tax planning strategies by firms. Hence, future studies could study how shift in tax policies, tax enforcement, or corporate tax incentives in Nigeria impact tax avoidance practices among firms in Nigeria. Also, future studies could analyse how institutional investors in Nigeria respond to regulatory changes and whether such changes alter the extent of tax avoidance practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmad Haruna Abubakar & Azam Abdelhakeem Khalid Ahmed & Rossazana Ab Rahim & Znar Nahro Ahmed, 2024. "Profitability, Inventory Intensity and Corporate Tax Avoidance in Nigeria: The Moderating Effect of Institutional Ownership," Capital Markets Review, Malaysian Finance Association, vol. 32(2), pages 69-83.
  • Handle: RePEc:mfa:journl:v:32:y:2024:i:2:p:69-83
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mfa.com.my/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/v32_i2_a5_pg69-83.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Tax avoidance; effective tax rate; inventory intensity; institutional ownership; Nigeria.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G3 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance
    • G38 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • H2 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue
    • H21 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Efficiency; Optimal Taxation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mfa:journl:v:32:y:2024:i:2:p:69-83. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Capital Market Review (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.