IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/emfitr/v61y2025i6p1712-1733.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Analysis of The Distortive Effect of Environmental Policy Stringency on Physical Trade Balance for Fossil Fuels in China

Author

Listed:
  • Godwin Olasehinde-Williams
  • Chien-Chiang Lee

Abstract

Utilizing advanced econometric techniques such as quantile ARDL regression and time-varying Granger causality tests, we offer empirical evidence that China’s stricter environmental policies distort its physical trade balance for fossil fuels. Our findings indicate a clear trend: stricter environmental policies cause significant increases in the amount by which fossil fuel resources contained in Chinese imports exceed those contained in its exports. This suggests a form of carbon leakage, where firms involved in domestic production and exportation of fossil fuels to evade the heightened costs associated with stringent regulations reduce domestic production, which is then replaced by foreign production. Our findings underscore an imbalance in the regulatory approach between domestic production/exports of fossil fuels and its imports. While regulations on domestic production and exports are becoming tighter, those governing imports remain relatively lax.

Suggested Citation

  • Godwin Olasehinde-Williams & Chien-Chiang Lee, 2025. "An Analysis of The Distortive Effect of Environmental Policy Stringency on Physical Trade Balance for Fossil Fuels in China," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(6), pages 1712-1733, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:mes:emfitr:v:61:y:2025:i:6:p:1712-1733
    DOI: 10.1080/1540496X.2024.2425722
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1540496X.2024.2425722
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1540496X.2024.2425722?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:emfitr:v:61:y:2025:i:6:p:1712-1733. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MREE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.