IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Gravity Equation Analysis in the Context of International Trade: Model Specification Implications in the Case of the European Union

Listed author(s):
  • Tiiu Paas
  • Egle Tafenau
  • Nancy J. Scannell

We examine model specification implications pursuant to gravity equation analysis in assessing the validity of new trade theory (NTT) models. The testing is conducted on twenty-three EU members, consisting of eight postsocialist transitional countries and fifteen developed countries, for the period 1994-2004. Our model specification borrows from Baltagi et al. (2003), employing fixed effects in the panel estimation. In accordance with them, we find that the appropriate model is specified as generally as possible. Divergent from them, we find that estimation results do not strongly depend on model specification. Yet, in analyzing trade flows for disaggregated samples, considerable sensitivity to specification is observed and an enigma encountered per findings with respect to trade behavior that support neither NTT nor the theory of comparative advantage. Estimation results are found not to depend on whether gross domestic product data are measured in nominal or purchasing power parity terms.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by M.E. Sharpe, Inc. in its journal Eastern European Economics.

Volume (Year): 46 (2008)
Issue (Month): 5 (September)
Pages: 92-113

in new window

Handle: RePEc:mes:eaeuec:v:46:y:2008:i:5:p:92-113
Contact details of provider: Web page:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:eaeuec:v:46:y:2008:i:5:p:92-113. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Nguyen)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.