IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/challe/v48y2005i4p88-104.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Professional Ethics Code for Economists

Author

Listed:
  • George DeMartino

Abstract

Perhaps economists would not need a professional ethics code if they knew with certainty what the outcomes of their policies would be. But they do not, and therefore they should abide by a higher standard of conduct.

Suggested Citation

  • George DeMartino, 2005. "A Professional Ethics Code for Economists," Challenge, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(4), pages 88-104.
    • Handle: RePEc:mes:challe:v:48:y:2005:i:4:p:88-104
    DOI: 10.1080/05775132.2005.11034308
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/05775132.2005.11034308
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/05775132.2005.11034308?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. William Prieto-Bustos, 2022. "Los programas académicos de economía: análisis comparativo de Europa y Colombia," Apuntes del Cenes, Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia, vol. 41(74), pages 41-70, July.
    2. Walter Enders & Gary Hoover, 2006. "Plagiarism in the Economics Profession: A Survey," Challenge, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(5), pages 92-107.
    3. Jérôme Ballet & François‐Régis Mahieu & Katia Radja, 2007. "Destabilising identity structures," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 34(1/2), pages 37-52, January.
    4. Gary Hoover, 2006. "A Game-Theoretic Model of Plagiarism," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 34(4), pages 449-454, December.
    5. Dürmeier, Thomas, 2012. "Wissenschaftlicher Pluralismus als Entdeckungsverfahren und das Monopol der Modellökonomik," ZÖSS-Discussion Papers 30, University of Hamburg, Centre for Economic and Sociological Studies (CESS/ZÖSS).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:challe:v:48:y:2005:i:4:p:88-104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MCHA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.