IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lus/zwipol/v71y2022i1p29-36n5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Der DMA kurz vor dem Kompromiss: Effektive und effiziente Digitalregulierung sicherstellen

Author

Listed:
  • Kühling Jürgen

    (Universität RegensburgInhaber des Lehrstuhls für Öffentliches Recht, Immobilienrecht, Infrastrukturrecht und InformationsrechtRegensburgDeutschland)

  • Stühmeier Torben

    (MonopolkommissionBonnDeutschland)

Abstract

After the European Commission, the European Parliament and the European Council presented their positions on the Digital Markets Act (DMA) last year, negotiations between the three institutions in the so-called triologue negotiations have been ongoing since the beginning of this year. There is probably agreement on the goal: The DMA should break up entrenched market positions of gatekeeper platforms and protect competition in the digital markets for the benefit of consumers. However, there still seems to be a need for discussion in detail, e. g., as regards the definition of addressees and the scope of conduct obligations (esp. the self-preferencing prohibition). The Monopolies Commission recently made some suggestions in this regard in a Special Report.

Suggested Citation

  • Kühling Jürgen & Stühmeier Torben, 2022. "Der DMA kurz vor dem Kompromiss: Effektive und effiziente Digitalregulierung sicherstellen," Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 71(1), pages 29-36, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:lus:zwipol:v:71:y:2022:i:1:p:29-36:n:5
    DOI: 10.1515/zfwp-2022-2071
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/zfwp-2022-2071
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/zfwp-2022-2071?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Digital Markets Act; Marktversagen; Digitale Ökosysteme; Regulierung;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K21 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Antitrust Law
    • K23 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Regulated Industries and Administrative Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lus:zwipol:v:71:y:2022:i:1:p:29-36:n:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.