IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lum/rev4rl/v3-4y2013ip151-160.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Judicial Review of a Contract Versus the Principle of Binding Force

Author

Listed:
  • Camelia IGNĂTESCU

    (Lecturer PhD, Stefan Cel Mare University of Suceava, Faculty of Economics and Public Administration;)

Abstract

In the legislation prior to October1, 2011, the cases in which the court could intervene and modify the contract were very few, conditions for exercising such prerogatives being specifically indicated. The present Civil Code is crossed by the idea of recognizing a court’s intervention power on the contract, much higher compared to the old regulation, in accordance with other states’legislation and the international law. In this paper we examine whether the principle of the binding force of a contract does not preclude the recognition of a right to judicial review of a contract.

Suggested Citation

  • Camelia IGNĂTESCU, 2013. "Judicial Review of a Contract Versus the Principle of Binding Force," Jurnalul de Studii Juridice, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics on Behalf of Petre Andrei University Iasi, vol. 3, pages 151-160, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:lum:rev4rl:v:3-4:y:2013:i::p:151-160
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.journaloflegalstudies.info/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    judicial review of a contract; the principle of binding force;

    JEL classification:

    • A23 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - Graduate

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lum:rev4rl:v:3-4:y:2013:i::p:151-160. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Antonio Sandu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://jls.upa.ro/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.