IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article



  • Russell G. MURPHY

    () (Suffolk University Law School, Boston, Massachusetts.)


A majority of American states recognize the death penalty as a lawful and constitutional sentence for the most serious crimes committed by the most dangerous and blameworthy criminals. However, in recent years, numerous flaws in capital punishment systems have caused courts in the United States to reverse death sentences. Over one hundred death row inmates have been exonerated and released from prison. These same problems – racial bias, untrustworthy evidence, police and prosecutor misconduct, jury malfunctioning – have been joined with more philosophical notions of the limits of government and respect for human dignity to make capital punishment a human rights violation. One state Governor, Mitt Romney of the U.S. State of Massachusetts, proposed legislation that would have eliminated many of the shortcomings of death penalty practice by creating a “foolproof” capital system built on heavy reliance on scientific evidence to establish guilt. This article describes that law, examines political reactions to it, and explores the political implications of Governor Romney’s efforts for his current campaign to become the 2012 Presidential nominee of the Republican Party of the United States.

Suggested Citation

  • Russell G. MURPHY, 2011. "INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS, A “FOOLPROOF” DEATH PENALTY ACT, AND THE POLITICS OF CAPITAL PUNISHMENT (English version)," Jurnalul de Studii Juridice, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics on Behalf of Petre Andrei University Iasi, vol. 1, pages 13-42, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:lum:rev4rl:v:1-2:y:2011:i::p:13-42

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item


    criminal sentencing; death penalty; capital punishment; legislation; public policy; human rights.;

    JEL classification:

    • A23 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - Graduate
    • K10 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - General (Constitutional Law)


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lum:rev4rl:v:1-2:y:2011:i::p:13-42. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Amariei Mirela). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.