IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS, A “FOOLPROOF” DEATH PENALTY ACT, AND THE POLITICS OF CAPITAL PUNISHMENT (English version)

  • Russell G. MURPHY

    ()

    (Suffolk University Law School, Boston, Massachusetts.)

Registered author(s):

    A majority of American states recognize the death penalty as a lawful and constitutional sentence for the most serious crimes committed by the most dangerous and blameworthy criminals. However, in recent years, numerous flaws in capital punishment systems have caused courts in the United States to reverse death sentences. Over one hundred death row inmates have been exonerated and released from prison. These same problems – racial bias, untrustworthy evidence, police and prosecutor misconduct, jury malfunctioning – have been joined with more philosophical notions of the limits of government and respect for human dignity to make capital punishment a human rights violation. One state Governor, Mitt Romney of the U.S. State of Massachusetts, proposed legislation that would have eliminated many of the shortcomings of death penalty practice by creating a “foolproof” capital system built on heavy reliance on scientific evidence to establish guilt. This article describes that law, examines political reactions to it, and explores the political implications of Governor Romney’s efforts for his current campaign to become the 2012 Presidential nominee of the Republican Party of the United States.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: http://jls.upa.ro/ro/arhiva-revista.html
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Editura Lumen, Department of Economics on Behalf of Petre Andrei University Iasi in its journal Jurnalul de Studii Juridice. Practica juridica- JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES. LEGAL PRACTICE.

    Volume (Year): 1-2 (2011)
    Issue (Month): (June)
    Pages: 13-42

    as
    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:lum:rev4rl:v:1-2:y:2011:i::p:13-42
    Contact details of provider: Web page: http://jls.upa.ro/

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lum:rev4rl:v:1-2:y:2011:i::p:13-42. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Amariei Mirela)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.