IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lum/rev3rl/v7y2016i1p35-54.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reflexive Transformation of Intimacy in Late Modernity Theories: Some Critiques and Conceptual Alternatives

Author

Listed:
  • Cãtãlina-Ionela REZEANU

    (University of Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

The last decades have seen a growing trend towards researching intimacy. A considerable amount of literature has been published based on the reflexive transformation of intimacy framework. This paper starts from the premise that, recently, more and more scholars have criticized the idea that detraditionalization and individualization led to the transformation of intimacy during reflexive modernity (late modernity). Critics question the ability of late modernity concepts to offer a cross-cultural and nuanced image of contemporary particularities of private life and intimate relations. The purpose of this study is to show the current state of knowledge in the social sciences on individualization thesis and detraditionalization thesis, the main theoretical criticisms of the two theses and conceptual alternatives to them. To achieve these goals, we conducted an interpretive synthesis of 16 articles from international literature, published between 1999-2014, in the thematic area of social changes brought by late modernity into the domain of private life and intimacy. In the Introduction section, we briefly present the two theses as reflected in the two of the most cited books on these themes: The Transformations of Intimacy. Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies (Giddens, 1992) and The Normal Chaos of Love (Beck and Beck-Gernsheim, 1995). In the body of the paper, we synthesize the arguments sustaining the criticism of the two theses and show some conceptual alternatives to these criticisms, as stated in the literature. In the concluding section, we resume the main arguments to open directions for future studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Cãtãlina-Ionela REZEANU, 2016. "Reflexive Transformation of Intimacy in Late Modernity Theories: Some Critiques and Conceptual Alternatives," Postmodern Openings, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 7(1), pages 35-54, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:lum:rev3rl:v:7:y:2016:i:1:p:35-54
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://postmodernopenings.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/PO_June2016_35to54.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    detraditionalization; individualization; pure relationship; democratization of intimacy; therapeutic culture.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A23 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - Graduate

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lum:rev3rl:v:7:y:2016:i:1:p:35-54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Antonio Sandu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/po/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.