IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lum/rev3rl/v12y2013i1p87-101.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Advance Directive from the Romanian Social Cultural Perspective Iasi: Editura Lumen, 2013 (English version)

Author

Listed:
  • Silvia DUMITRAS

    (Postdoctoral researcher, Center for Ethics and Health Policies Iasi; „Gr. T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi)

  • Mariana ENACHE

    (Postdoctoral researcher, Center for Ethics and Health Policies Iasi; „Gr. T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi)

  • Andrada PARVU

    (Postdoctoral researcher, Center for Ethics and Health Policies Iasi; „Gr. T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi; Assistent Professor, Hematology Department, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Stefana Maria MOISA

    (Postdoctoral researcher, Center for Ethics and Health Policies Iasi; „Gr. T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi)

  • Catalin IOV

    („Gr. T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi; TRIAS Microelectronics, Iasi; associate lecturer, Constanta Maritime University, Romania)

  • Beatrice IOAN

    (Assoc. Prof. Dr., „Gr. T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi; MD, Ph.D., MA in Bioethics, Institute of Forensic Medicine, Iasi, Romania)

Abstract

Giving value to the wishes of the terminal patients regarding the treatment at the end of their life, the use of the advance directive, as an extension of their autonomy when the patients are incompetent, represents a mean to respect and promote their dignity. The authors present and discuss the results of their research that analysed the attitude of Romanians toward the use of the advance directive to identify the usefulness of implementing such a document in the Romanian social cultural context. The target group in this research is general population over 18 years old, speaking Romanian and without psychological illnesses. The representative random sample lot included 828 persons from Iasi County. The data were recorded based on a transversal descriptive study, using the method of questionnaire enquiry The persons participating in the study admitted the importance of respecting the patient’s dignity and autonomy with reference to decisions concerning the treatment at the end of life. For the subjects agreeing with legalizing the advance directive, the main advantages of such a document are firstly the respect of the patient’s right to decide and secondly the improvement of the medical treatment. The study showed that young, healthy and better educated individuals are interested in the advance directive and are in favour of introducing it in the current medical practice. The results of our research suggest that educational and informative programmes are needed in Romania regarding the role and usefulness of the advance directive, as well as the way to implement it, in order to encourage the implication of all adult persons in planning their own medical treatment in general and in particular in the medical decisions concerning the end of life.

Suggested Citation

  • Silvia DUMITRAS & Mariana ENACHE & Andrada PARVU & Stefana Maria MOISA & Catalin IOV & Beatrice IOAN, 2013. "Advance Directive from the Romanian Social Cultural Perspective Iasi: Editura Lumen, 2013 (English version)," Postmodern Openings, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 12(1), pages 87-101, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:lum:rev3rl:v:12:y:2013:i:1:p:87-101
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://postmodernopenings.com/archives/1132
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    medical decision; end of life; advance directive; ethics;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A23 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - Graduate
    • I0 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lum:rev3rl:v:12:y:2013:i:1:p:87-101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Antonio Sandu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/po/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.