Author
Listed:
- Volodymyr Bekh
(National Pedagogical Dragomanov University)
- Alla Yaroshenko
(National Pedagogical Dragomanov University)
- Tetiana Zhyzhko
(National Pedagogical Dragomanov University)
- Vatiliy Ignatyev
(Donetsk National Medical University)
- Roman Dodonov
(Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University)
Abstract
The modern world is colorful, diverse, contradictory and not without contradictions. Accordingly, the problems of the modern world are a combination of various problems closely intertwined and interconnected. So, the study of the fundamental foundations of cognition becomes relevant, among which the postmodern methodology stands out as particularly pluralistic, in its development it responded to the trends of the time and was always aimed at solving problems of a particular person, distinguished by the “humanity”, “reality” of thought. Within the framework of postmodernism, representatives of this trend pose problems that are difficult to solve. Firstly, this is due to the fact that postmodernists claim that, on the one hand, speech-discourse constructs reality, and on the other, reality itself determines discourse. Secondly, they emphasize that there is no place for a general theory either in science or in humanitarian studies, while this statement is part of theoretical knowledge. Third, in discussing consumer society, cultural pluralism, postmodernists turn to “realistic ontology”. So, putting forward the thesis that society is a kind of product of discourse, they voluntarily or involuntarily uphold the idealistic epistemology. The ideas of postmodernism can be perceived very differently. A certain number of people may “not accept” the views of postmodernism, depriving its representatives of an essential role in modern philosophy of science.
Suggested Citation
Volodymyr Bekh & Alla Yaroshenko & Tetiana Zhyzhko & Vatiliy Ignatyev & Roman Dodonov, 2020.
"Postmodern Picture of Reality of Scientific Knowledge: Evolution by Epistemological Diversity,"
Postmodern Openings, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 11(3), pages 207-219, October.
Handle:
RePEc:lum:rev3rl:v:11:y:2020:i:3:p:207-219
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18662/po/11.3/208
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- A23 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - Graduate
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lum:rev3rl:v:11:y:2020:i:3:p:207-219. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Antonio Sandu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/po/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.