Author
Listed:
- Adrian Tosca
(Structural Management Solutions, Bucharest)
- Catalin Ionita
(Structural Management Solutions, Bucharest)
- Dan Florin Stanescu
(National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, Bucharest, Romania)
- Alina Stanciu
(Structural Management Solutions, Bucharest)
Abstract
Game-based ratings have received a lot of media attention and managed to capture the interests of many organizations (eg Unilever, AXA Group, Deloitte etc.). In a recent study of human resources practitioners, 75% of participants indicated that they would consider using gamification as part of their own recruitment and selection strategy in the near future. Following the methodological approach already used in educational environment, two approaches to building and using GBA in the organizational environment can be distinguished: gamified assessment – by gamifying (already existing) psychometric test; psychometric play - use of a game to gather evaluation data. It is well accepted that, the basis of the success of any company is due to the human capital, which is the combination of people’s capabilities and skills. Therefore, the fundamental job of any recruiter is sourcing talent and engaging employees in the organization. For this, they have to ensure that the candidate’s skills match well with the organization’s requirement and culture. Previous studies highlighted that those applying for a job are eager to use game-based assessment for self-evaluation, especially when these games are available for free. Game-based assessments can also help maintain a high commitment during the evaluation, which reduces the likelihood of some candidates dropping out in the process and also increases the amount of time that data can be collected. Current paper aim at presenting the preliminary efforts made to gamify two psychometric tests, namely spatial and verbal reasoning.
Suggested Citation
Adrian Tosca & Catalin Ionita & Dan Florin Stanescu & Alina Stanciu, 2019.
"Innovative Solutions for Online Recruitment – Gamified Assessment,"
Postmodern Openings, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 10(1), pages 151-164, March.
Handle:
RePEc:lum:rev3rl:v:10:y:2019:i:1:p:151-164
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18662/po/59
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- A23 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - Graduate
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lum:rev3rl:v:10:y:2019:i:1:p:151-164. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Antonio Sandu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/po/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.