Going counter to the facts in program evaluation. Towards a counterfactual evaluation model (CEM) (English version)
The present article aims at bringing closer to the public the logic behind Counterfactual Impact Evaluation (CIE). It starts with a semantic disclosure, continuing with asserting the the main counterfactual theories and their application in the Program Evaluation field and ends with the construction of a Counterfactual Evaluation Model. The article intends to present, in an introductory manner, some of the possible and probable uses of the CEM. The main question is: does it make any sense to go counter to the facts in Program Evaluation?
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lum:rev2rl:v:36:y:2012:i::p:224-233. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Morariu Irina)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.