IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lum/rev1rl/v17y2025i4p274-296.html

Bridging the Gap: Integrating Traditional Methodologies in Language Teaching

Author

Listed:
  • Inna Kivenko

    (PhD, Associate Professor, Odesa National Maritime University, Ukraine)

  • Olena Moskaliuk

    (PhD, Associate Professor, Odesa National Maritime University, Ukraine)

  • Hanna Poliakova

    (Сandidate of Pedagogical Science, Assistant Professor, Odesа National Maritime University, Ukraine)

  • Iryna Repushevska

    (PhD, Assistant Professor, Odesa National Maritime University, Ukraine)

  • Anna Shapoval

    (PhD, Assistant Professor, Odesa National Maritime University, Ukraine)

  • Tetiana Yablonska

    (Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor, Odesa National Maritime University, Ukraine)

  • Natalia Koval

    (Candidate of Philological Sciences, Associate Professor, Drohobych Ivan Franko State Pedagogical University, Ukraine)

  • Olena Koliasa

    (PhD, Post-doctoral Researcher, Lviv Ivan Franko National University; Associate Professor, Drohobych Ivan Franko State Pedagogical University; Odesa National Maritime University, Ukraine; Visiting Researcher, the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2009, Australia)

Abstract

This study examines the adoption of innovative language learning methodologies by English language teachers through a survey of 100 educators across Ukrainian institutions. The research reveals significant pedagogical transformation, with 57% of teachers actively implementing innovative techniques alongside traditional Communicative and Grammar-Translation Methods. Educators are demonstrating an increasing adoption of Content-Based, Blended Learning, Project-Based, and Task-Based approaches, indicating a shift toward dynamic, learner-centred instruction. Academic institutions serve as the primary source of methodological knowledge (45%), followed by Internet resources (28%). However, limited engagement with in-service training, workshops, and scholarly literature reveals gaps in continuous professional development, highlighting the need for structured support programs. Teachers show strong technological integration, with 82% utilising films and videos, while 51-55% employ apps, online worksheets, and digital assessments. This technological fluency reflects fundamental changes in language pedagogy aligned with digital learning environments.Despite positive attitudes, significant barriers impede innovation. Infrastructure deficiencies (37%) and insufficient training (30%) emerge as primary obstacles, alongside curriculum constraints (21%) and limited consultation opportunities (15%). These systemic challenges require institutional investment in resources and comprehensive training programs. Student responses to innovative methods prove overwhelmingly positive, with 88% of teachers reporting favourable reactions and 77% deeming the implementations successful. This alignment between pedagogical innovation and learner engagement validates innovative approaches to education. The findings indicate English language education stands at a transformative juncture. Teachers demonstrate readiness for methodological innovation, yet systemic support remains essential for sustained implementation. Addressing infrastructure and training gaps while maintaining educator enthusiasm offers a pathway toward enhanced language learning outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Inna Kivenko & Olena Moskaliuk & Hanna Poliakova & Iryna Repushevska & Anna Shapoval & Tetiana Yablonska & Natalia Koval & Olena Koliasa, 2025. "Bridging the Gap: Integrating Traditional Methodologies in Language Teaching," Revista romaneasca pentru educatie multidimensionala - Journal for Multidimensional Education, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 17(4), pages 274-296, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:lum:rev1rl:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:274-296
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/17.4/1057
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.inmanifest.com/index.php/rrem/article/view/7420/5300
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/17.4/1057?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lum:rev1rl:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:274-296. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Antonio Sandu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/rrem/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.