IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lum/rev1rl/v17y2025i4p153-170.html

Between Structure and Creativity – Romanian Kindergarten Teachers’ Professional Reasoning in Selecting Didactic Strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Popa

    (Teacher Training Department, “Lucian Blaga†University of Sibiu, Sibiu, Romania)

Abstract

This qualitative study explores how kindergarten teachers make professional decisions when selecting didactic strategies in their daily classroom practice. Drawing on fifty semi-structured interviews with teachers, the research examines how educators navigate the balance between structured teaching methods—such as memorization, observation, and exercises—and creative, play-based approaches including storytelling, modelling, and artistic expression. Using a grounded theory approach, the analysis reveals that teachers’ choices are shaped by multiple interrelated factors: curriculum requirements, children’s developmental needs, the emotional climate of the group, and teachers’ personal beliefs about learning and play. Findings indicate that teachers engage in a dynamic process of reasoning that blends experience, intuition, and reflection to ensure both cognitive progress and creative freedom. The resulting conceptual model highlights the central role of professional judgment and flexibility in early childhood education, portraying teachers as reflective practitioners who continuously adapt their strategies to promote meaningful, holistic learning experiences for young children.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Popa, 2025. "Between Structure and Creativity – Romanian Kindergarten Teachers’ Professional Reasoning in Selecting Didactic Strategies," Revista romaneasca pentru educatie multidimensionala - Journal for Multidimensional Education, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 17(4), pages 153-170, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:lum:rev1rl:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:153-170
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/17.4/1051
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.inmanifest.com/index.php/rrem/article/view/7581/5291
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/17.4/1051?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lum:rev1rl:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:153-170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Antonio Sandu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/rrem/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.