Author
Listed:
- Victor MANOLACHI
(PhD habil., univ. prof. Cross-Border Faculty, “Dunarea de Jos†University of Galati (Romania); State University of Moldova, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova)
- Veaceslav MANOLACHI
(PhD, habil., univ. prof, Cross-Border Faculty, “Dunarea de Jos†University of Galati (Romania); State University of Moldova, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova)
Abstract
The issue of amateur and professional sports has been a subject of concern in the sports world for many decades, significantly influencing the careers of numerous athletes. It constitutes a fundamental question in the development of sport in the twentieth century. Despite the current practical solutions, attitudes toward professional sports remain complex, not only among officials and athletes but also within the academic community. The professionalization of Olympic sports has been a rather intricate process. A similar situation can be observed in Ancient Greece, where the history of the Olympic Games evolved in comparable ways. Although the ancient Olympic Games were, in many respects, different from the modern ones, a certain analogy can be drawn between the development of the ancient and modern Games in terms of addressing the issues of professionalism and amateurism. The peak period of Olympic complications in Ancient Greece falls within the so-called Panhellenic era (576–338 BCE). This was the time when professional athletes began to participate in competitions. The widespread view in the former USSR, which interprets the history of the ancient Olympic Games as evidence that professional sports pose a serious threat to modern global sports and the Olympic movement, is mistaken.
Suggested Citation
Victor MANOLACHI & Veaceslav MANOLACHI, 2025.
"Professional versus Amateur Sports: A Short Comparative Analysis of Educational Values, Structure, and Impact,"
Revista romaneasca pentru educatie multidimensionala - Journal for Multidimensional Education, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 17(3), pages 214-231, September.
Handle:
RePEc:lum:rev1rl:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:214-231
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/17.3/1020
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lum:rev1rl:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:214-231. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Antonio Sandu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/rrem/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.