IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lum/rev13d/vviiy2019i2p57-65.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interferences between the Abuse of Rights and Defrauding the Law - Conceptual Delimitations, Cases and Controversies

Author

Listed:
  • Camelia Maria Cezara Ignatescu

    (Associate Professor PhD, Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava)

Abstract

Whereas defrauding the law implies, in fact, the official, but artificial and illegitimate usage of rights to cover the real intention of the subject, which is to circumvent legal provisions, and the abuse of rights implies exceeding the reasonable limits of exercising a legally recognized right, the subject thus violating the purpose for which the law recognizes and defends that right, sometimes the two notions seem to overlap or create confusion as to the correct legal framing and contextualization of the legal situation. The present article therefore aims to present the conceptual delimitations between the abuse of rights and the defrauding the law, grafted on examples, in order to clarify a series of debates and controversies in the literature and the legal practice regarding the interference between the two concepts.

Suggested Citation

  • Camelia Maria Cezara Ignatescu, 2019. "Interferences between the Abuse of Rights and Defrauding the Law - Conceptual Delimitations, Cases and Controversies," Logos Universalitate Mentalitate Educatie Noutate - Sectiunea Drept/ Logos Universality Mentality Education Novelty - Section: Law, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 7(2), pages 57-65, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:lum:rev13d:v:vii:y:2019:i:2:p:57-65
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.18662/lumenlaw/27
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/lumenlaw/article/view/2440
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.18662/lumenlaw/27?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    abuse of rights; defrauding the law; paulian action; civil offense;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A23 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - Graduate

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lum:rev13d:v:vii:y:2019:i:2:p:57-65. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Antonio Sandu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edituralumen.ro .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.