IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Jurisprudenta Curtii Europene a Drepturilor Omului in Materie de Imixtiune in infaptuirea Justitiei - The Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights Regarding Interference in Justice Administration (Romanian version)

Listed author(s):
  • Victor MORARU


    (Faculty of Law, “Stefan cel Mare” from Republic Moldova)

Registered author(s):

    The prohibition of any interference in the court’s work, but also the continuous promotion of legal interests is an important public value in any democratic society. However, in many cases these values are in conflict with other interests - both private and public. Regarding this problem in this study, we sought to answer the question: Is it possible to admit any interference in the work of justice administration, and if so, what are the acceptable limits for this interference? Due to the fact that in the national jurisdiction we cannot find a plausible answer to this question, our scientific approach aimed to study the European practice in matter of determining the acceptable limits of interference in the work of the judge. Therefore, our investigation is focused on the most relevant cases tangent with the question of allowable limits of interference in the work of the judge, namely: The Sunday Times v. United Kingdom and De Haes & Gijsels v. Belgium.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Editura Lumen, Department of Economics in its journal Logos Universalitate Mentalitate Educatie Noutate - Sectiunea Drept/ Logos Universality Mentality Education Novelty - Section: Law.

    Volume (Year): 1 (2011)
    Issue (Month): (February)
    Pages: 13-24

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:lum:rev13d:v:1:y:2011:i::p:13-24
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lum:rev13d:v:1:y:2011:i::p:13-24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Morariu Irina)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.