IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lum/rev11d/v1y2010i5p92-96.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Monocameralism versus Bicameralism în Sistemul Constitutional Romanesc - Unicameralism versus Bicameralism in the Romanian Constitutional System (Romanian version)

Author

Listed:
  • Magda-Ioana IACOB

    () (“Petre Andrei” University from Iasi)

Abstract

Most countries with unicameral parliaments are unitary, non-federal states. These states considered from the very beginning that they do not need a second Chamber, The Upper House, or they had it dissolved later. Unicameralism advocates argue that Upper House’s commonly features , The Senate in our case , and the review of the legislation can be accomplished for example by Parliament’s committees. The main critic brought to bicameralism system was that it is not suited for a unitary state, as Romania, because it slows the legislative process, meanwhile the unicameralism system would be less expensive.

Suggested Citation

  • Magda-Ioana IACOB, 2010. "Monocameralism versus Bicameralism în Sistemul Constitutional Romanesc - Unicameralism versus Bicameralism in the Romanian Constitutional System (Romanian version)," Anuarul Universitatii „Petre Andrei” din Iasi / Year-Book „Petre Andrei” University from Iasi, Fascicula: Drept, Stiinte Economice, Stiinte Politice / Fascicle: Law, Economic Sciences, Political Scien, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 1(5), pages 92-96, Decembrie.
  • Handle: RePEc:lum:rev11d:v:1:y:2010:i:5:p:92-96
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://edituralumen.ro
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    constitutional system; bicameralism; law; Romania; conflict;

    JEL classification:

    • A23 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - Graduate
    • K10 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - General (Constitutional Law)

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lum:rev11d:v:1:y:2010:i:5:p:92-96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Amariei Mirela). General contact details of provider: http://edituralumen.ro .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.