IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lde/journl/y2010i73p275-301.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pros and Cons of Teaching and Research in the History of Economic Thought Today

Author

Listed:
  • Jimena Hurtado
  • Andrés Álvarez

Abstract

This article intends to rebut the arguments against teaching and research in the history of economic thought, thus, highlighting its relevance in the academic formation of future economists. In a moment where economics has been questioned for its inability to provide answers and for its fascination with measurement and technique, we believe it is time to advocate and promote history of economic thought as a field of reflection, criticism and introspection. A field that shows future economists that economics is a process and not a product, providing them with the necessary insights to participate actively in the “extended present” of their discipline

Suggested Citation

  • Jimena Hurtado & Andrés Álvarez, 2010. "Pros and Cons of Teaching and Research in the History of Economic Thought Today," Lecturas de Economía, Universidad de Antioquia, Departamento de Economía, issue 73, pages 275-301.
  • Handle: RePEc:lde:journl:y:2010:i:73:p:275-301
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B4b2eQDlIUAJRnI1Wmt1SzY5ek0
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    History of Economic Thought; teaching; research; economic theory;

    JEL classification:

    • A11 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Role of Economics; Role of Economists
    • A13 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Relation of Economics to Social Values
    • A14 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Sociology of Economics
    • A22 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - Undergraduate
    • B2 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lde:journl:y:2010:i:73:p:275-301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Carlos Andrés Vasco Correa). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/deantco.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.