IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lap/recadm/89.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reflexiones acerca de la metodologia cualitativa para el estudio de las organizaciones

Author

Listed:
  • Adriana Fassio

    (Facultad de Ciencias Económicas. Universidad Nacional de Buenos Aires. Argentina.)

Abstract

This article discusses the complementarity/ antagonism of the qualitative and quantitative perspectives, from which some aspects of the qualitative paradigm are explored and bring into play for the organizational diagnosis.It reflects on the components and sequence of the decisions that are made throughout an organizational research based on the qualitative perspective, as well as the scope and difficulties that are faced.

Suggested Citation

  • Adriana Fassio, 2018. "Reflexiones acerca de la metodologia cualitativa para el estudio de las organizaciones," Revista Ciencias Administrativas (CADM), IIA, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Instituto de Investigaciones Administrativas, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, issue 12, pages 73-84, July-Dece.
    • Handle: RePEc:lap:recadm:89
    DOI: 10.24215/23143738e028
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistas.unlp.edu.ar/CADM/article/view/3767
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24215/23143738e028?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Qualitative Methodology; Organizational Diagnosis.;

    JEL classification:

    • L29 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Other
    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lap:recadm:89. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ana Clara Calabria (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aunlpar.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.