IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kof/anskof/v14y2020i2p35-44.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Projektion von Kosten und Nutzen für Firmen mit einer dualen Berufslehre in Nepal

Author

Abstract

A pilot project of a dual apprenticeship has started in Nepal in autumn 2018. Apprentices usually spend one day per week in school and five days per week in a company. The introduction of a dual apprenticeship faces the challenge that the companies have no experience regarding the costs and benefits they can expect. This can prevent companies from providing apprenticeship places. In order to reduce that uncertainty, this analysis presents a projection of costs and benefits for parti-cipating companies based on a phone survey among firms. The results show that companies make a small net benefit since apprentices’ productive value is slightly larger than the accruing costs for companies. The most important cost category is apprentice wages, followed by the costs for trainers, while non-wage compensation of apprentices is relatively minor. The net benefits are larger for electrical engineering apprentices than for mechanical engineering apprentices

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Bolli & Johanna Mirka Bolli-Kemper & Ursula Renold, 2020. "Projektion von Kosten und Nutzen für Firmen mit einer dualen Berufslehre in Nepal," KOF Analysen, KOF Swiss Economic Institute, ETH Zurich, vol. 14(3), pages 35-44, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:kof:anskof:v:14:y:2020:i:2:p:35-44
    DOI: 10.3929/ethz-b-000420547
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000420547
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3929/ethz-b-000420547?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    dual apprenticeship; costs; benefits; net benef;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I21 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Analysis of Education

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kof:anskof:v:14:y:2020:i:2:p:35-44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/koethch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.