IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/sbusec/v9y1997i5p403-09.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Good Are the U.K. VAT Registration Data at Measuring Firm Births?

Author

Listed:
  • Johnson, Peter
  • Conway, Cheryl

Abstract

This paper utilises some data from a survey of recent VAT registrations in the North of England to examine two issues: first, the extent to which registrants are involved in setting up entirely new businesses; and secondly, the relationship between the date of registration and the start of trading. The paper suggests that some caution should be exercised in the use of VAT registration statistics in the analysis of firm births. Copyright 1997 by Kluwer Academic Publishers

Suggested Citation

  • Johnson, Peter & Conway, Cheryl, 1997. "How Good Are the U.K. VAT Registration Data at Measuring Firm Births?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 9(5), pages 403-409, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:sbusec:v:9:y:1997:i:5:p:403-09
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journals.kluweronline.com/issn/0921-898X/contents
    File Function: link to full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. John Ball, 2007. "New Firm Formation — is VAT Registration Data an Accurate Indicator?," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 22(3), pages 279-292, August.
    2. Michael Anyadike-Danes & Mark Hart & Helena Lenihan, 2011. "New business formation in a rapidly growing economy: the Irish experience," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 36(4), pages 503-516, May.
    3. Andrew Atherton, 2006. "Should Government be Stimulating Start-ups? An Assessment of the Scope for Public Intervention in New Venture Formation," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 24(1), pages 21-36, February.
    4. Michael Anyadike-Danes & Mark Hart, 2006. "The impact of Sector, Specialisation, and Space on Business Birth Rates in the United Kingdom: A Challenge for Policy?," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 24(6), pages 815-826, December.
    5. Andrew G Ross & Kenny Crossan & Linda Juleff, 2012. "How accurate are VAT registrations as a measure of entrepreneurship?," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 27(3), pages 279-296, May.
    6. Andrew Ross, 2011. "Regional Determinants of Entrepreneurship in a Small Economy: Panel Data Evidence from Scotland," ERSA conference papers ersa11p848, European Regional Science Association.
    7. James Derbyshire & Garry Haywood, 2007. "Schumpeterian 'Creative Destruction' and Strengthening the Business Stock Through Firm Formation," Working Papers 200739, University of Liverpool, Department of Economics.
    8. Egeln, Jürgen & Falk, Ulrich & Heger, Diana & Höwer, Daniel & Metzger, Georg, 2010. "Ursachen für das Scheitern junger Unternehmen in den ersten fünf Jahren ihres Bestehens," ZEW Expertises, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research, number 110531.
    9. Angelo Cavallo & Antonio Ghezzi & Alessandra Colombelli & Gian Luca Casali, 2020. "Agglomeration dynamics of innovative start-ups in Italy beyond the industrial district era," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 239-262, March.
    10. Michael Anyadike-Danes & Helena Lenihan & Mike Hart, 2009. "New Business Formation: An Important Element of Ireland's Rapid Growth Experience?," Working Papers wp380, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    11. repec:rdg:wpaper:em-dp2010-06 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Peter Johnson, 2004. "Differences in Regional Firm Formation Rates: A Decomposition Analysis," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 28(5), pages 431-446, September.
    13. James Derbyshire, 2009. "Uncovering Creative Destruction brought about by New Firm Formation: A New Method and Data Source," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 24(4), pages 310-322, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:sbusec:v:9:y:1997:i:5:p:403-09. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.