IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/rqfnac/v16y2001i1p33-52.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Internal versus External Equity Funding

Author

Listed:
  • Park, Chul W
  • Pincus, Morton

Abstract

Because of transactions costs and investor/manager information asymmetries, internally generated funds should be less costly than funds raised by issuing common shares. This suggests that as firms use more internal funds relative to external equity, their costs of equity capital will fall and the rate the market uses to discount unexpected earnings of such firms will be lower. We hypothesize that (1) firms having a higher proportion of internal to external equity will have larger earnings response coefficients, and (2) this effect will be magnified for high growth firms since the disparity between inside information and publicly available information about high growth firms' investment opportunities is greatest. We find support for both hypotheses using pooled and annual cross-sectional regressions after controlling for other determinants of ERCs. The results are also generally robust to alternative measures of the mix of equity funding sources and of unexpected earnings and to consideration of other factors affecting the mix of equity capital. Copyright 2001 by Kluwer Academic Publishers

Suggested Citation

  • Park, Chul W & Pincus, Morton, 2001. "Internal versus External Equity Funding," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 33-52, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:rqfnac:v:16:y:2001:i:1:p:33-52
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journals.kluweronline.com/issn/0924-865X/contents
    File Function: link to full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Matthew Ege & Jennifer L. Glenn & John R. Robinson, 2020. "Unexpected SEC Resource Constraints and Comment Letter Quality†," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(1), pages 33-67, March.
    2. Neeraj J. Gupta & Joseph Golec, 2012. "Do Investors Use Customer Metrics To Value High Growth Service Firms?," The International Journal of Business and Finance Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 6(2), pages 1-19.
    3. Zheng Wang, 2014. "Measuring investors’ assessment of earnings persistence: do investors see through smoothed earnings?," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 42(4), pages 691-708, May.
    4. James Linck & Thomas Lopez & Lynn Rees, 2007. "The valuation consequences of voluntary accounting changes," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 327-352, May.
    5. Hanwen Chen & Wang Dong & Hongling Han & Nan Zhou, 2017. "A comprehensive and quantitative internal control index: construction, validation, and impact," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 49(2), pages 337-377, August.
    6. Dimitropoulos, Panagiotis E. & Asteriou, Dimitrios & Kousenidis, Dimitrios & Leventis, Stergios, 2013. "The impact of IFRS on accounting quality: Evidence from Greece," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 108-123.
    7. Abdelsalam, Omneya & Dimitropoulos, Panagiotis & Elnahass, Marwa & Leventis, Stergios, 2016. "Earnings management behaviors under different monitoring mechanisms: The case of Islamic and conventional banks," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 132(S), pages 155-173.
    8. Stergios Leventis & Panagiotis Dimitropoulos, 2012. "The role of corporate governance in earnings management: experience from US banks," Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(2), pages 161-177, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:rqfnac:v:16:y:2001:i:1:p:33-52. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.