IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/pubcho/v1y1966i1p141-159.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Information without profit

Author

Listed:
  • Gordon Tullock

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Gordon Tullock, 1966. "Information without profit," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 141-159, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:1:y:1966:i:1:p:141-159
    DOI: 10.1007/BF01718991
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF01718991
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF01718991?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gordon Tullock, 1988. "The costs of rent seeking: A metaphysical problem," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 15-24, April.
    2. Blankart, Charles B., 1974. "Grenzen der konstitutionellen Eigentumsgarantie," Discussion Papers, Series I 48, University of Konstanz, Department of Economics.
    3. Laura E. Grant, 2021. "Does the introduction of ratings reduce giving? Evidence from charities," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 59(3), pages 978-995, July.
    4. Benjamin Bittschi & Sarah Borgloh & Berthold U. Wigger, 2020. "Philanthropy in a Secular Society," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 176(4), pages 640-664.
    5. John Cullis & Philip Jones & Constantine Thanassoulas, 1984. "Are charities efficient ‘firms’? A preliminary test of the UK charitable sector," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 367-373, January.
    6. Valentinov, Vladislav & Iliopoulos, Constantine, 2013. "Economic theories of nonprofits and agricultural cooperatives compared: New perspectives for nonprofit scholars," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 42(1), pages 109-126.
    7. Richard Wallick, 2012. "Agent-based modeling, public choice, and the legacy of Gordon Tullock," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 152(1), pages 223-244, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:1:y:1966:i:1:p:141-159. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.