Testing the Buchanan-Wagner Hypothesis: European Evidence from Panel Unit Root and Cointegration Tests
According to the Buchanan-Wagner hypothesis, public deficits reduce the perceived price of public goods to the current generation of voters who, in turn, increase the demands for such social services. Several recent studies have attempted to test this proposition. In this paper, we apply modern time series techniques organized around panel unit root and panel cointegration to draw sharper conclusions from the short time series that are typically available. We find that there is a long run positive relationship between government spending and government deficits for each country individually, as well as for the panel as a whole. This provides support for the BW hypothesis. We also analyze the implications for the relative productivity performance of the public and private sector, the existence of scale economies in the provision of public services, as well as the extent of crowding out effects. Copyright 2003 by Kluwer Academic Publishers
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:115:y:2003:i:3-4:p:439-53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Guenther Eichhorn)or (Christopher F. Baum)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.