IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/poprpr/v44y2025i3d10.1007_s11113-025-09956-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public Opposition to Abortion in Central Asia’s Rapidly Changing Socio-Normative Context: A Case Study of Kyrgyzstan

Author

Listed:
  • Victor Agadjanian

    (University of California–Los Angeles)

  • Lesia Nedoluzhko

Abstract

Public views on abortion and corresponding policies vary globally and have evolved differently in different parts of the world. These trends are reflective of broader normative transitions. While most current debates in Western contexts revolve around the legality of abortion, in countries where this legality is not directly questioned, changing public attitudes may still have important implications for access to and utilization of abortion services. We use data from two rounds of a nationally representative survey conducted in the Kyrgyz Republic, a post-Soviet nation in Central Asia where abortion is legal but where the broader societal normative landscape has been evolving rapidly, shaped by a combination of enduring legacies of the Soviet era, considerable exposure to western values, and rising neo-traditionalism. We focus on opposition to abortion and distinguish between two scenarios for economically motivated abortion– one for marital pregnancy and another for non-marital pregnancy. We find instructive variations in opposition to abortion under each scenario, illustrating their context-specific complexities. In general, however, our findings point to rising opposition to abortion, which is reflective of the growing normative conservatism in this and similar post-Soviet settings. We also link these context-unique features to more universal determinants of abortion attitudes.

Suggested Citation

  • Victor Agadjanian & Lesia Nedoluzhko, 2025. "Public Opposition to Abortion in Central Asia’s Rapidly Changing Socio-Normative Context: A Case Study of Kyrgyzstan," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 44(3), pages 1-21, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:poprpr:v:44:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s11113-025-09956-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s11113-025-09956-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11113-025-09956-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11113-025-09956-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Remennick, Larissa I., 1991. "Epidemology and determinants of induced abortion in the U.S.S.R," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 33(7), pages 841-848, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Victor Agadjanian & Sam Hyun Yoo, 2018. "Migration, legality, and fertility regulation: Abortion and contraception among migrants and natives in Russia," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 38(42), pages 1277-1302.
    2. Victoria I. Sakevich & Boris P. Denisov, 2014. "Birth Control In Russia: Overcoming The State System Resistance," HSE Working papers WP BRP 42/SOC/2014, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    3. Saverio Bellizzi & Giuseppe Pichierri & Catello M Panu Napodano & Paola Murgia & Susanna Padrini & Quique Bassat, 2021. "Place of birth for unintended pregnancies in six former Soviet Union countries," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(5), pages 1553-1560, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:poprpr:v:44:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s11113-025-09956-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.