IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jcopol/v39y2016i1p63-90.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Wanted: a Bigger Stick. On Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts with Online Service Providers

Author

Listed:
  • Marco Loos
  • Joasia Luzak

Abstract

The Unfair Contract Terms Directive offers consumers protection from pre-formulated imbalanced contract terms. While the standard terms and conditions of online service providers have previously been accused of harming clients of such online services, a comprehensive analysis of the potential unfair character of such terms and conditions in line with the interpretation of the Directive supplied by the CJEU has not yet been provided. This paper aims to fill in this gap in the academic literature. It identifies several types of contractual terms used by international online service providers in their consumer contracts, which are unlikely to pass the Directive’s unfairness test. Copyright The Author(s) 2016

Suggested Citation

  • Marco Loos & Joasia Luzak, 2016. "Wanted: a Bigger Stick. On Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts with Online Service Providers," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 63-90, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:jcopol:v:39:y:2016:i:1:p:63-90
    DOI: 10.1007/s10603-015-9303-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10603-015-9303-7
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10603-015-9303-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hans-W. Micklitz & Przemysław Pałka & Yannis Panagis, 2017. "The Empire Strikes Back: Digital Control of Unfair Terms of Online Services," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 40(3), pages 367-388, September.
    2. F. Lagioia & A. Jabłonowska & R. Liepina & K. Drazewski, 2022. "AI in Search of Unfairness in Consumer Contracts: The Terms of Service Landscape," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 481-536, September.
    3. M. Durovic & J. Poon, 2023. "Consumer Vulnerability, Digital Fairness, and the European Rules on Unfair Contract Terms: What Can Be Learnt from the Case Law Against TikTok and Meta?," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 419-443, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jcopol:v:39:y:2016:i:1:p:63-90. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.