IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jbuset/v199y2025i3d10.1007_s10551-024-05851-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Institutionalizing Sustainability: The Role of Multiple Logics in B Corp Course Integration

Author

Listed:
  • Maija Lähteenkorva

    (University of Jyväskylä)

Abstract

Sustainability has gained increased importance in business schools, yet its full institutionalization within the curricula remains challenging. To address this gap, business schools are increasingly collaborating with alternative organizations, such as B Corporations. However, the factors driving the integration of these B Corp courses into the curricula are not well understood. This study employs an institutional logic approach to examine in what way institutional logics coexist and shape the integration of B Corp courses within business school curricula. A qualitative analysis of 31 U.S. business schools revealed how the coexistence and hybridization of industry, social institution, and sustainability logic shape B Corp course framing, implementation, and perception. Industry logic drives career readiness and market alignment, social institution logic emphasizes community engagement and ethical responsibility, and sustainability logic promotes long-term impact and transformative education. This research contributes to the discourse on sustainability in business education by illustrating how multiple institutional logics can coexist constructively, offering a model for enhancing the effectiveness of sustainability initiatives in higher education.

Suggested Citation

  • Maija Lähteenkorva, 2025. "Institutionalizing Sustainability: The Role of Multiple Logics in B Corp Course Integration," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 199(3), pages 481-494, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:199:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s10551-024-05851-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s10551-024-05851-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10551-024-05851-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10551-024-05851-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Snelson-Powell, Annie C. & Grosvold, Johanne & Millington, Andrew I., 2020. "Organizational hypocrisy in business schools with sustainability commitments: The drivers of talk-action inconsistency," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 408-420.
    2. Bullinger, Bernadette & Kieser, Alfred & Schiller-Merkens, Simone, 2015. "Coping with institutional complexity: Responses of management scholars to competing logics in the field of management studies," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 437-450.
    3. Domenico Dentoni & Verena Bitzer & Stefano Pascucci, 2016. "Cross-Sector Partnerships and the Co-creation of Dynamic Capabilities for Stakeholder Orientation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(1), pages 35-53, April.
    4. Minelle E. Silva & Marina D. Figueiredo, 2017. "Sustainability as Practice: Reflections on the Creation of an Institutional Logic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-13, October.
    5. Pauline Mattsson & Eugenia Perez Vico & Linus Salö, 2024. "Introduction: Universities and the Matter of Mattering," Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management, in: Pauline Mattsson & Eugenia Perez Vico & Linus Salö (ed.), Making Universities Matter, pages 1-10, Springer.
    6. Melissa Edwards & Paul Brown & Suzanne Benn & Christopher Bajada & Robert Perry & Deborah Cotton & Walter Jarvis & Gordon Menzies & Ian McGregor & Katrina Waite, 2020. "Developing sustainability learning in business school curricula – productive boundary objects and participatory processes," Published Paper Series 2020-1, Finance Discipline Group, UTS Business School, University of Technology, Sydney.
    7. Durand, Rodolphe & Thornton, Patricia, 2018. "Categorizing Institutional Logics, Institutionalizing Categories: A Review of Two Literatures," HEC Research Papers Series 1276, HEC Paris, revised 30 May 2018.
    8. Rieneke Slager & Sareh Pouryousefi & Jeremy Moon & Ethan D. Schoolman, 2020. "Sustainability Centres and Fit: How Centres Work to Integrate Sustainability Within Business Schools," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 161(2), pages 375-391, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Minelle E. Silva & Breno Nunes, 2022. "Institutional logic for sustainable purchasing and supply management: Concepts, illustrations, and implications for business strategy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 1138-1151, March.
    2. Ivana Milosevic & A. Erin Bass & Ben Schulte, 2023. "The Interplay of Conflicting and Complementing Institutional Logics in Sustainability Practices," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 63(3), pages 469-506, June.
    3. Disraeli Asante-Darko & Samuel Ato Dadzie & Amoako Kwarteng & Sena Agbodjah & Theodora Ekua Aryee, 2024. "Effects of Circular Economy Practices and Accounting Innovations on Sustainable Development Goals," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 4(4), pages 3059-3092, December.
    4. Cholez, Celia & Pauly, Olivier & Mahdad, Maral & Mehrabi, Sepide & Giagnocavo, Cynthia & Bijman, Jos, 2023. "Heterogeneity of inter-organizational collaborations in agrifood chain sustainability-oriented innovations," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    5. Cheung, Zeerim & Aalto, Eero & Nevalainen, Pasi, 2020. "Institutional Logics and the Internationalization of a State-Owned Enterprise: Evaluation of International Venture Opportunities by Telecom Finland 1987–1998," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 55(6).
    6. Xianliang Shi & Genzhu Li & Ciwei Dong & Yefei Yang, 2020. "Value Co-Creation Behavior in Green Supply Chains: An Empirical Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-26, July.
    7. Anson Au, 2025. "Does Listing Farther Influence Carbon Emissions Production? Evidence From Internationally Cross‐Border Listed Firms," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(3), pages 3832-3853, May.
    8. Jesús de Frutos-Belizón & Fernando Martín-Alcázar & Gonzalo Sánchez-Gardey, 2021. "The research–practice gap in the field of HRM: a qualitative study from the academic side of the gap," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(6), pages 1465-1515, August.
    9. Bammens, Yannick & Hünermund, Paul, 2023. "Ecological community logics, identifiable business ownership, and green innovation as a company response," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(8).
    10. Yáñez-Valdés, Claudia & Guerrero, Maribel & Barros-Celume, Sebastián & Ibáñez, María J., 2023. "Winds of change due to global lockdowns: Refreshing digital social entrepreneurship research paradigm," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    11. Ahmed H. Elsayed & María Luisa Pajuelo & Issa Almaghaireh & Khalil Chaaban & Islam Homsi & Moataz Elmassri, 2025. "Fostering Sustainability Leadership Through SDG 13 Integration in Business Curricula," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-32, September.
    12. Magnus Boström & Erik Andersson & Monika Berg & Karin Gustafsson & Eva Gustavsson & Erik Hysing & Rolf Lidskog & Erik Löfmarck & Maria Ojala & Jan Olsson & Benedict E. Singleton & Sebastian Svenberg &, 2018. "Conditions for Transformative Learning for Sustainable Development: A Theoretical Review and Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-21, November.
    13. Manyise, Timothy & Dentoni, Domenico, 2021. "Value chain partnerships and farmer entrepreneurship as balancing ecosystem services: Implications for agri-food systems resilience," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    14. Nathaniel D. Line & Rodney C. Runyan & Tracy Gonzalez-Padron, 2019. "Multiple stakeholder market orientation: a service-dominant logic perspective of the market orientation paradigm," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 9(1), pages 42-60, June.
    15. Andreas Hesse & Karin Kreutzer & Marjo-Riitta Diehl, 2019. "Dynamics of Institutional Logics in a Cross-Sector Social Partnership: The Case of Refugee Integration in Germany," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(3), pages 679-704, October.
    16. Raysa Rocha & Paulo Pinheiro, 2021. "Business Education: Filling the Gaps in the Leader’s Awareness Concerning Organizational Phronesis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, February.
    17. Ye, Qin & Cai, Yue & Wang, Jingbei, 2024. "Navigating institutional complexity: How firms respond to conflicting patenting demands from competing institutional logics," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    18. Olivier Boiral & Marie‐Christine Brotherton & David Talbot & Laurence Guillaumie, 2022. "Legitimizing unsustainable practices: The institutional logics of pro‐pesticide organizations," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2284-2298, July.
    19. Wu, Xiaojie & Chen, Xiaomei & Wang, Xiuqiong, 2025. "With whom to be distinctive? Examining the impact of innovation narrative distinctiveness from the category prototype vs. category exemplar on firm performance," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    20. Jafari Sadeghi, Vahid & Nkongolo-Bakenda, Jean-Marie & Anderson, Robert B. & Dana, Léo-Paul, 2019. "An institution-based view of international entrepreneurship: A comparison of context-based and universal determinants in developing and economically advanced countries," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 1-1.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:199:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s10551-024-05851-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.