IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/iecepo/v22y2025i4d10.1007_s10368-025-00676-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does over-regulation and outward FDI deter global value chain participation in regional trade agreements?

Author

Listed:
  • Nida Rahman

    (School of Business, University of Petroleum and Energy Studies)

  • Krishan Sharma

    (School of Management, Bennett University)

Abstract

This study investigates whether over-regulation and outward foreign direct investment (OFDI) deter global value chain (GVC) participation within the three largest regional trade agreements (RTAs): the European Union (EU), Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), and the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). The paper explores two key questions: (1) How do capital flows, including inward and outward FDI, influence GVC participation across these RTAs? (2) What role does institutional quality, particularly regulatory quality and government effectiveness, play in GVC integration? Using panel data for 43 countries from 2008 to 2020 and employing a panel regression model with panel-corrected standard errors (PCSE), the analysis finds that capital flows exhibit limited influence on GVC participation, suggesting that pre-existing production networks within these RTAs reduce the need for additional FDI inflows or outflows. However, institutional quality plays a significant and nuanced role. In RCEP, government effectiveness negatively impacts backward participation but enhances forward participation, while excessive regulation hinders GVC engagement. The EU exhibits an inverted U-shaped relationship between regulatory quality and GVC participation, indicating that excessive compliance costs deter integration. In USMCA, regulatory factors have minimal impact. Policy recommendations emphasize streamlining regulations in RCEP, balancing compliance costs in the EU, and enhancing supply chain infrastructure in USMCA to sustain GVC competitiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Nida Rahman & Krishan Sharma, 2025. "Does over-regulation and outward FDI deter global value chain participation in regional trade agreements?," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 1-23, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:iecepo:v:22:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s10368-025-00676-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s10368-025-00676-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10368-025-00676-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10368-025-00676-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James E. Anderson & Eric van Wincoop, 2003. "Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 93(1), pages 170-192, March.
    2. Cristina JUDE & Grégory LEVIEUGE, 2013. "Growth Effect of FDI in Developing Economies: the Role of Institutional Quality," LEO Working Papers / DR LEO 2251, Orleans Economics Laboratory / Laboratoire d'Economie d'Orleans (LEO), University of Orleans.
    3. Zhang, Song & Chen, Chunlai & Li, Haoze, 2024. "Can outward FDI promote export diversification for emerging economies? Firm-level evidence from China," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 269-280.
    4. Pesaran M.H. & Schuermann T. & Weiner S.M., 2004. "Modeling Regional Interdependencies Using a Global Error-Correcting Macroeconometric Model," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 22, pages 129-162, April.
    5. Su Pan & Zhaohui Chong, 2023. "Effects of FDI on trade among countries along the Belt and Road: A network perspective," The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1), pages 84-103, January.
    6. Hoekman, Bernard & Djankov, Simeon, 1997. "Determinants of the Export Structure of Countries in Central and Eastern Europe," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 11(3), pages 471-487, September.
    7. Andrei A. Levchenko, 2007. "Institutional Quality and International Trade," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 74(3), pages 791-819.
    8. Henri L. F. De Groot & Gert‐Jan Linders & Piet Rietveld & Uma Subramanian, 2004. "The Institutional Determinants of Bilateral Trade Patterns," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(1), pages 103-123, February.
    9. Beck, Nathaniel & Katz, Jonathan N., 1995. "What To Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 89(3), pages 634-647, September.
    10. Contractor, Farok J. & Dangol, Ramesh & Nuruzzaman, N. & Raghunath, S., 2020. "How do country regulations and business environment impact foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows?," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(2).
    11. Nida Rahman & Krishan Sharma, 2023. "Exploring the impact of RCEP on Malaysia: insights from select manufacturing industries," Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 40(1), pages 23-36, April.
    12. Oliver E. Williamson, 2000. "The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 38(3), pages 595-613, September.
    13. Johannes Moenius & Daniel Berkowitz, 2004. "Institutional Change and Product Composition: Does the Initial Quality of Institutions Matter?," William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series 2004-662, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan.
    14. Ines Kersan-Škabić, 2019. "The drivers of global value chain (GVC) participation in EU member states," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1), pages 1204-1218, January.
    15. Nathaniel Beck, 2001. "Time‐series–cross‐section Data," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 55(2), pages 111-133, July.
    16. Contractor, Farok J. & Nuruzzaman, N. & Dangol, Ramesh & Raghunath, S., 2021. "How FDI Inflows to Emerging Markets Are Influenced by Country Regulatory Factors: An Exploratory Study," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(1).
    17. Lars Leszczensky & Tobias Wolbring, 2022. "How to Deal With Reverse Causality Using Panel Data? Recommendations for Researchers Based on a Simulation Study," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 51(2), pages 837-865, May.
    18. Ge, Ying & Dollar, David & Yu, Xinding, 2020. "Institutions and participation in global value chains: Evidence from belt and road initiative," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    19. Essaji, Azim & Fujiwara, Kinya, 2012. "Contracting institutions and product quality," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 269-278.
    20. Waseem Ahmad Khan & Zia Ur Rahman & Jianming Ye, 2023. "Exploring the potential determinants of Chinese OFDI towards OBOR nations: an application of gravity model," Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(4), pages 1067-1085, July.
    21. Fukunari Kimura & Kozo Kiyota, 2006. "Exports, FDI, and Productivity: Dynamic Evidence from Japanese Firms," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 142(4), pages 695-719, December.
    22. Torfinn Harding & Beata S. Javorcik, 2012. "Foreign Direct Investment and Export Upgrading," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 94(4), pages 964-980, November.
    23. Daniel Hoechle, 2007. "Robust standard errors for panel regressions with cross-sectional dependence," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 7(3), pages 281-312, September.
    24. Bell, Andrew & Jones, Kelvyn, 2015. "Explaining Fixed Effects: Random Effects Modeling of Time-Series Cross-Sectional and Panel Data," Political Science Research and Methods, Cambridge University Press, vol. 3(1), pages 133-153, January.
    25. Ghodsi, Mahdi, 2020. "How do technical barriers to trade affect foreign direct investment? Tariff jumping versus regulation haven hypotheses," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 269-278.
    26. Samina Sabir & Anum Rafique & Kamran Abbas, 2019. "Institutions and FDI: evidence from developed and developing countries," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 5(1), pages 1-20, December.
    27. Jeff Luckstead & Stephen Devadoss & Xin Zhao, 2024. "Gravity trade model with firm heterogeneity and horizontal foreign direct investment," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 106(1), pages 206-225, January.
    28. Hao Chen & Jiadong Pan & Wen Xiao, 2020. "Chinese Outward Foreign Direct Investment and Industrial Upgrading from the Perspective of Differences among Countries," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 28(3), pages 1-28, May.
    29. Li, Yunong & Yang, Mengkai & Zhu, Lianming, 2021. "FDI, Export Sophistication, and Quality Upgrading: Evidence from China's WTO Accession," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    30. Nuno Carlos Leitão, 2023. "A Gravity Model Analysis of Portuguese Foreign Direct Investment," Economies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-16, September.
    31. Anna Golovko & Hasan Sahin, 2021. "Analysis of international trade integration of Eurasian countries: gravity model approach," Eurasian Economic Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 11(3), pages 519-548, September.
    32. Buchanan, Bonnie G. & Le, Quan V. & Rishi, Meenakshi, 2012. "Foreign direct investment and institutional quality: Some empirical evidence," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 81-89.
    33. Hui Wang & Xin Zhong, 2023. "An Empirical Study on the Impact of Chinese OFDI on the Global Value Chain Positions of Countries Along the Belt and Road and Threshold Effects," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440231, February.
    34. Hang Su & Yao Fu, 2021. "The Impact of the Outward and Inward FDI on Global Value Chains," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 11(6), pages 1-8.
    35. Song Zhang & Chunlai Chen, 2020. "Does Outward Foreign Direct Investment Facilitate China's Export Upgrading?," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 28(5), pages 64-89, September.
    36. Kottaridi, Constantina & Giakoulas, Dimitris & Manolopoulos, Dimitris, 2019. "Escapism FDI from developed economies: The role of regulatory context and corporate taxation," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 36-47.
    37. Shuyuan Jiang & Dan Cheng, 2017. "The Impact of Outward FDI on the Upgrading of China¡¯s Manufacturing Industry Structure: A Literature Review," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(6), pages 154-161, June.
    38. Haiyun Liu & Xuefeng Wang, 2022. "Spillover Effects of Foreign Direct Investment on Export Sophistication: Evidence from Chinese Domestic Manufacturing Firms," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(11), pages 2393-2408, November.
    39. Natália Barbosa, 2023. "Outward Foreign Direct Investment, Restructuring and Performance Upgrading: Firm-level Evidence from Portugal," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 24(2), pages 281-294, April.
    40. Heckelman, Jac C. & Wilson, Bonnie, 2019. "The growth-maximizing level of regulation: Evidence from a panel of international data," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 354-368.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Heyman Fredrik & Tingvall Patrik Gustavsson, 2015. "The Dynamics of Offshoring and Institutions," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 15(4), pages 1975-2016, October.
    2. Suadat Hussain Wani & Effat Yasmin, 2023. "India’s trade with South and Central Asia: an application of institution-based augmented gravity model," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-12, December.
    3. Yu, Shu & Beugelsdijk, Sjoerd & de Haan, Jakob, 2015. "Trade, trust and the rule of law," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 102-115.
    4. Shadrack Muthami Mwatu, 2022. "Institutions and export performance: firm level evidence from Kenya," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 69(4), pages 487-506, December.
    5. Álvarez, Inmaculada C. & Barbero, Javier & Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés & Zofío, José L., 2018. "Does Institutional Quality Matter for Trade? Institutional Conditions in a Sectoral Trade Framework," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 72-87.
    6. Nicolas Sauter, 2012. "Talking trade: language barriers in intra-Canadian commerce," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 42(1), pages 301-323, February.
    7. Mehmet Huseyin Bilgin & Giray Gozgor & Chi Keung Marco Lau, 2017. "Institutions and gravity model: the role of political economy and corporate governance," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 7(3), pages 421-436, December.
    8. Matthias Helble & Ben Shepherd & John S. Wilson, 2009. "Transparency and Regional Integration in the Asia Pacific," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(3), pages 479-508, March.
    9. Francois, Joseph & Manchin, Miriam, 2013. "Institutions, Infrastructure, and Trade," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 165-175.
    10. Sebil Olalekan Oshota & Bashir Adelowo Wahab, 2022. "Institutional Quality and Intra-Regional Trade Flows: Evidence from ECOWAS," Journal of African Trade, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 73-106, December.
    11. Shu Yu & Jakob de Haan & Sjoerd Beugelsdijk & Jakob de Haan, 2011. "Trade, Trust and Institutions," CESifo Working Paper Series 3571, CESifo.
    12. Adeel Ahmad DAR & Taj MUHAMMAD & M. Wasif SIDDIQI, 2020. "Bureaucratic Quality and FDI Inflows Nexus: A South Asian Perspective," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(3), pages 149-168, September.
    13. Nathan Nunn, 2007. "Relationship-Specificity, Incomplete Contracts, and the Pattern of Trade," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 122(2), pages 569-600.
    14. Fiankor, Dela-Dem Doe & Martinez-Zarzoso, Inmaculada & Brümmer, Bernhard, 2018. "Exports and governance: the role of private voluntary standards," GlobalFood Discussion Papers 275059, Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen, GlobalFood, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development.
    15. Murat Genç & David Law, 2014. "A Gravity Model of Barriers to Trade in New Zealand," Treasury Working Paper Series 14/05, New Zealand Treasury.
    16. Albert Millogo & Ines Trojette, 2020. "Pro-trade effects of MENA immigrants in France: does governance matter?," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 40(4), pages 3219-3230.
    17. Bengt Söderlund & Patrik Tingvall, 2014. "Dynamic effects of institutions on firm-level exports," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 150(2), pages 277-308, May.
    18. (ed.), 0. "Research Handbook on Economic Diplomacy," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 16053.
    19. Nvuh‐Njoya Youssouf & Keneck‐Massil Joseph & Yogo Urbain Thierry, 2024. "Constitutional instability and foreign direct investment in Africa," Economics of Transition and Institutional Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(1), pages 3-23, January.
    20. Wenshou Yan & Xi Yang, 2019. "A New Motivation for Sustainable Trade Between Countries with Different Regulatory Qualities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • F0 - International Economics - - General
    • F1 - International Economics - - Trade
    • F2 - International Economics - - International Factor Movements and International Business
    • F21 - International Economics - - International Factor Movements and International Business - - - International Investment; Long-Term Capital Movements
    • F23 - International Economics - - International Factor Movements and International Business - - - Multinational Firms; International Business

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:iecepo:v:22:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s10368-025-00676-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.