IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/ecopln/v56y2023i6d10.1007_s10644-023-09509-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Equilibrium analysis of multi-parties of interest conflicts and game in the operation of smart city PPP projects

Author

Listed:
  • Yong Zhang

    (Anhui Polytechnic University)

  • Qian Zhang

    (Anhui Polytechnic University)

Abstract

In recent years, some smart cities that are keen on construction and operation in some cities have also emerged some strange phenomena and problems, such as “data islands,” “hidden dangers of information security,” “zombie apps,” “breakdown of public–private cooperation” and “digital divide.” These alienation phenomena reflect the complex conflicts and contradictions of interests among multiple stakeholders in project construction and operation from different perspectives. It also shows diversity, acuteness, complexity, and harmfulness, which is not conducive to the smooth development and effective operation of the project construction. The operation of smart city PPP projects is the key to the success or failure of the project, and the conflicts and game of multi-parties of interest in the project operation have a crucial impact on the smooth implementation and sustainable development of the project. This study further explores the multi-stakeholder entities involved in the operation stage of the project and their game relationships, and explores the equilibrium solution of the game. Through game analysis, it is found that the resolution and coordination of interest conflicts need to fully consider the mechanism of constraints and their changes in different cases, and the key is the government incentive and constraint mechanism. The difficulty of the interest game lies in how the government correctly treats the participation of the private sector and the public, how to perform the supervision and management duties, and the key to the coordination of interests lies in how to exert the power of public participation. The results are shown as follows. When the government’s incentive strength continues to increase from weak to strong, the corresponding tripartite stable equilibrium result will gradually evolve from the stability point (0, 1, 1) to the stability point (1, 1, 1). the project company will spontaneously carry out high-quality project operation under the role of the incentive mechanism, and the public will spontaneously and consciously participate in the project operation supervision process.

Suggested Citation

  • Yong Zhang & Qian Zhang, 2023. "Equilibrium analysis of multi-parties of interest conflicts and game in the operation of smart city PPP projects," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 56(6), pages 4009-4041, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:ecopln:v:56:y:2023:i:6:d:10.1007_s10644-023-09509-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s10644-023-09509-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10644-023-09509-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10644-023-09509-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tarlok Singh, 2022. "Economic growth and the state of poverty in India: sectoral and provincial perspectives," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 1251-1302, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khanh Duong & Eoin Flaherty, 2023. "Does growth reduce poverty? The mediating role of carbon emissions and income inequality," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 56(5), pages 3309-3334, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:ecopln:v:56:y:2023:i:6:d:10.1007_s10644-023-09509-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.