IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/asiapa/v42y2025i2d10.1007_s10490-023-09929-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is ambivalent emotion good or bad for creativity? A moderated mediation model of the new construct of emotional stability

Author

Listed:
  • Yan Li

    (Beijing Institute of Technology)

  • Abdul Gaffar Khan

    (Beijing Institute of Technology
    Mawlana Bhashani Science and Technology University)

  • Sizhi Chen

    (Beijing Institute of Technology)

Abstract

Ambivalent situations activate ambivalent emotions (i.e., the simultaneous experience of discrete emotions such as happiness and sadness), which is a ubiquitous phenomenon in organizations. Yet, how and when does ambivalent emotion foster or impede creativity? Unfortunately, prior scholars have largely overlooked the consequences of ambivalent emotion. However, informational theories of emotion deem that ambivalent emotion stimulates more information, which facilitates creativity. On the other hand, another resource depletion perspective thinks ambivalence is a stressful situation that hinders creativity, which demands more psychological resources to identify and solve problems in a new way. Drawing from the lenses of conservation of resources theory (COR), informational theories of emotion, the theory of emotion regulation strategy, and the bifurcation model of affect, a moderated mediation model is developed and found where two facets (i.e., information searching and coding engagement and idea generation engagement) of creative process engagement mediate the association between ambivalent emotion and creativity, in which ambivalent emotion diminishes the two facets of creative process engagement so that results in undermined creativity. And one dimension (i.e., emotion threshold) of a new construct of emotional stability moderated the mediation effect of idea generation engagement in the process, such that this relationship is stronger when emotion threshold is high. This study also reveals that another dimension (i.e., emotion recovery) of the new emotional stability positively relates to creativity. We test and find support for our theorized hypotheses across two field studies using Chinese samples (N =294) and Bangladeshi samples (N =243 with multi-wave and multisource designs). The theoretical and practical implications of these findings in organizations, their plausible limitations, and future directions are addressed.

Suggested Citation

  • Yan Li & Abdul Gaffar Khan & Sizhi Chen, 2025. "Is ambivalent emotion good or bad for creativity? A moderated mediation model of the new construct of emotional stability," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 42(2), pages 595-631, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:asiapa:v:42:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s10490-023-09929-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10490-023-09929-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10490-023-09929-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10490-023-09929-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:asiapa:v:42:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s10490-023-09929-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.