IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/asiaeu/v23y2025i1d10.1007_s10308-025-00715-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The EU-Japan economic partnership agreement in Japanese print media: a “cars-for-cheese deal” or “the black ships of European cheese”?

Author

Listed:
  • Tine Walravens

    (ReD Associates)

  • Ivar Padrón-Hernández

    (Institute of Innovation Research, Hitotsubashi University)

Abstract

The EU-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement (EJEPA) entered into force on February 1st, 2019. The agreement was quickly coined the “cars-for-cheese deal”: Agri-food seemed to be the largest winner on the European side while Japan stood to gain most from automotive exports. Up until the final negotiations, however, agri-food was a major stumbling block. Through a qualitative content analysis of EJEPA coverage in five Japanese newspapers with different political and industry profiles, this article examines media treatment of food as a controversial part of the EJEPA. While narratives differed depending on political and industry leanings, we find that the perceived threat from the EJEPA regarding food was often placed within a larger social imagery of a new global order and disadvantageous trade deals, through a conflation with the recently established Trans-Pacific Partnership and its widely reported impact on agriculture. Lastly, beyond a strongly defensive or even victimized narrative in some specialized media, mainstream newspapers also divert attention toward the potential opportunities the EJEPA brings to Japanese exporters and manufacturers.

Suggested Citation

  • Tine Walravens & Ivar Padrón-Hernández, 2025. "The EU-Japan economic partnership agreement in Japanese print media: a “cars-for-cheese deal” or “the black ships of European cheese”?," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 1-22, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:asiaeu:v:23:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s10308-025-00715-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s10308-025-00715-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10308-025-00715-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10308-025-00715-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hanns Günther Hilpert, 2018. "The Japan-EU Economic Partnership Agreement—economic potentials and policy perspectives," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 439-447, December.
    2. Claes G. Alvstam & Erja Kettunen, 2019. "The EU-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement: Second Best Option or New Generation of Preferential Trade Arrangements?," CESifo Forum, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 20(02), pages 3-9, July.
    3. Hidetaka Yoshimatsu, 2020. "The EU-Japan free trade agreement in evolving global trade politics," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 429-443, December.
    4. Davis, Eric & Sabala, Ethan & Russell, Dylan & Beckman, Jayson, 2023. "The Impact of Recent Trade Agreements on Japan’s Pork Market," Economic Research Report 338952, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    5. Chae-Deug Yi, 2022. "The impact of the Japan-European Union Economic Partnership Agreement on the trade and income of Japan, the European Union, and South Korea," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 329-356, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kari Irwin Otteburn, 2023. "All in favour? Indian business interests and the India-EU FTA," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 311-329, September.
    2. Chengwei Xu & Guanie Lim, 2024. "Global Britain, Belt and Road Initiative, and New Southbound Policy: Which One Matters to Southeast Asia?," GRIPS Discussion Papers 24-05, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies.
    3. Dawid Jabkowski, 2024. "Development Prospects for EU Trade in Agri-food Products with Japan and Vietnam," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 288-302.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:asiaeu:v:23:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s10308-025-00715-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.