IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/asiaeu/v12y2014i3p345-359.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Publics and biobanks in China and Europe: a comparative perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Johannes Starkbaum
  • Haidan Chen
  • Herbert Gottweis

Abstract

We compare public perceptions of biobanks in China and in Europe, reporting similarities and differences in how publics in Europe and China view key issues in the realm of biobank research. Despite many differences in perception, the similarity in the perception of biobanks in China and in Europe is striking. Our research finds that Chinese with lower education levels are less concerned about privacy, while those with higher education levels have preferences in privacy protection that are similar to those in Europe. Transnational research is perceived positively in both regions, but specific historical experiences shape how people approach these issues. While Chinese publics focus on certain effects of international research on the Chinese state, Europeans are mainly concerned about data security and impacts on research. The study is based on 66 focus groups conducted in China (6) and Europe (60), with approximately 700 participants. Copyright Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Suggested Citation

  • Johannes Starkbaum & Haidan Chen & Herbert Gottweis, 2014. "Publics and biobanks in China and Europe: a comparative perspective," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 345-359, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:asiaeu:v:12:y:2014:i:3:p:345-359
    DOI: 10.1007/s10308-014-0396-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10308-014-0396-4
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10308-014-0396-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chen, Haidan, 2021. "Privacy in breast cancer biobank: Chinese patients’ perceptions," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:asiaeu:v:12:y:2014:i:3:p:345-359. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.