IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jle/journl/v5y2018i4p127-140.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Study Of Evaluation Brics-T Countries Based On The Global Competitiveness Index

Author

Listed:
  • Erkan BÄ°L

    (Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University)

  • Tanju GÃœDÃœK

    (Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University)

  • Gülay KESKÄ°N

    (Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University)

Abstract

Through globalization, countries aim to haveacompetitive advantage about trading and increasing financial opportunitiesin the global market with international collaboration and economic integration. In recent years, the emerging and expanding national economies like Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa have became key players and taken investors’ attention globally. In addition to these countries known as BRICS, Turkey is also another expanding national economy that attracts investors with strong economic growth in the last 20 years. Therefore, recently the idea of becoming one of the members of BRICS for Turkey has been considered. Nowadays, the index research studies which show the global competitiveness, rankings and detailed data profiles of the international markets are published by different authorities. One of the highly trusted authorities, World Economic Forum publishes Global Competitiveness Index every year.The purpose of this study is to indicate similarities and differences among these 6 countries (BRICS-T) and also define comparison to each other based on the data from Global Competitiveness Index (2017-2018). In the process of analyzing the data, multidimensional scale has been used. According to the data of Global Competitiveness Index (2017-2018), the similarities are more likely to be found between Russia and Turkey while India and China also project similar features together. The most different features have been observed between Brazil and China. The similarities are based ondetailed data company profiles of global competitiveness. In conclusion, the result shows that Russia and Turkey are seen as one group while China and India generate also another group together. On the other hand, Brazil and South Africa stand alone in their own groups.

Suggested Citation

  • Erkan BÄ°L & Tanju GÃœDÃœK & Gülay KESKÄ°N, 2018. "The Study Of Evaluation Brics-T Countries Based On The Global Competitiveness Index," JOURNAL OF LIFE ECONOMICS, Holistence Publications, vol. 5(4), pages 127-140, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:jle:journl:v:5:y:2018:i:4:p:127-140
    DOI: 10.15637/jlecon.265
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ratingacademy.com.tr/ojs/index.php/jlecon/article/view/461/342
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15637/jlecon.265?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Global Competitiveness Index; WEF; BRICS-T; Multidimensional Scale;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D41 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - Perfect Competition
    • D53 - Microeconomics - - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium - - - Financial Markets
    • O12 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Microeconomic Analyses of Economic Development
    • O16 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Financial Markets; Saving and Capital Investment; Corporate Finance and Governance
    • F12 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Models of Trade with Imperfect Competition and Scale Economies; Fragmentation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jle:journl:v:5:y:2018:i:4:p:127-140. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mehmet ÅžAHÄ°N (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.gen.tr/index.php/jlecon .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.