IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jis/ejistu/y2025i02id567.html

Institutional Efficiency and Research Productivity in Transitional Higher Education Systems: Panel Evidence from Uzbekistan

Author

Listed:
  • QAYUMOVA Muborak
  • BILAN Svitlana
  • TAGAEV Behzod

Abstract

This study investigates the determinants of research productivity in Uzbekistan’s public universities using a balanced panel of 15 institutions over 2010–2023. The analysis integrates three complementary dimensions: human capital, institutional efficiency, and macroeconomic conditions to explain why research output varies markedly across universities during a period of rapid reforms. A fixed-effects instrumental-variable model is employed to control for unobserved institutional characteristics and potential endogeneity in spending efficiency and economic indicators. The results show that academic staff capacity is the strongest predictor of research productivity, while GDP growth also contributes positively by creating more stable conditions for long-term academic development. Education spending efficiency has a meaningful effect, suggesting that governance and internal management shape how resources translate into research outcomes. These findings underscore the need to strengthen faculty development, improve institutional accountability, and align higher education policy with national economic priorities.

Suggested Citation

  • QAYUMOVA Muborak & BILAN Svitlana & TAGAEV Behzod, 2025. "Institutional Efficiency and Research Productivity in Transitional Higher Education Systems: Panel Evidence from Uzbekistan," European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Bucharest Economic Academy, issue 02, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:jis:ejistu:y:2025:i:02:id:567
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ejist.ro/files/pdf/567.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ejist.ro/abstract/567/Institutional-Efficiency-and-Research-Productivity-in-Transitional-Higher.html
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kwiek, Marek, 2015. "The unfading power of collegiality? University governance in Poland in a European comparative and quantitative perspective," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 77-89.
    2. Alina Irina POPESCU, 2012. "Branding cities as educational centres. The role of higher education institutions," Management & Marketing, Economic Publishing House, vol. 7(3), Autumn.
    3. Giovanni Abramo & Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo, 2014. "How do you define and measure research productivity?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 101(2), pages 1129-1144, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Edison Jair Duque Oliva & Javier A. Sánchez-Torres, 2023. "Building a University City Brand: Colombian University Students’ Perceptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-24, April.
    2. Saima Javed & Yu Rong & Hafiz Muhammad Ihsan Zafeer & Samra Maqbool & Babar Nawaz Abbasi, 2024. "Unleashing the potential: a quest to understand and examine the factors enriching research and innovation productivities of South Asian universities," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Rodríguez-Navarro, Alonso & Brito, Ricardo, 2018. "Technological research in the EU is less efficient than the world average. EU research policy risks Europeans’ future," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 718-731.
    4. Abramo, Giovanni & Aksnes, Dag W. & D’Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea, 2020. "Comparison of research performance of Italian and Norwegian professors and universities," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 14(2).
    5. Giovanni Abramo & Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo, 2024. "The scientific standing of nations and its relationship with economic competitiveness," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(6), pages 1-15, June.
    6. Abramo, Giovanni & D’Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea, 2015. "Ranking research institutions by the number of highly-cited articles per scientist," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 915-923.
    7. Giovanni Abramo & Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo, 2022. "Drivers of academic engagement in public–private research collaboration: an empirical study," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 47(6), pages 1861-1884, December.
    8. Marek Kwiek, 2018. "High research productivity in vertically undifferentiated higher education systems: Who are the top performers?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 115(1), pages 415-462, April.
    9. Shaw, Marta A., 2019. "Strategic instrument or social institution: Rationalized myths of the university in stakeholder perceptions of higher education reform in Poland," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 9-21.
    10. Giovanni Abramo & Francesca Apponi & Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo, 2024. "Do research universities specialize in disciplines where they hold a competitive advantage?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(9), pages 5453-5468, September.
    11. Andrea Mervar & Maja Jokić, 2023. "Correction: Core-periphery nexus in the EU social sciences: bibliometric perspective," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(7), pages 4165-4165, July.
    12. SooJeung Lee & Su Jin Kim & Sunna Park & Jung Cheol Shin, 2025. "Unequal metrics in research publications: the impact of bibliometric databases and faculty size across academic disciplines on university rankings in South Korea," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(2), pages 641-663, February.
    13. Andrada Elena Urda-Cîmpean & Sorana D. Bolboacă & Andrei Achimaş-Cadariu & Tudor Cătălin Drugan, 2016. "Knowledge Production in Two Types of Medical PhD Routes—What’s to Gain?," Publications, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-16, June.
    14. Rongrong Li & Feng Ren & Qiang Wang, 2024. "China–US scientific collaboration on sustainable development amidst geopolitical tensions," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, December.
    15. Giovanni Abramo & Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo & Francesco Rosati, 2016. "Gender bias in academic recruitment," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 106(1), pages 119-141, January.
    16. repec:hal:cepnwp:hal-01922263 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Juanim Juanim & Ina Ratnamiasih, 2017. "The Influence of Leadership and Organizational Support on Community Commitment and City Image of Bandung," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 7(5), pages 9-16.
    18. Ruiz-Castillo, Javier, 2016. "Research output indicators are not productivity indicators," UC3M Working papers. Economics we1601, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Economía.
    19. Edson Melo Souza & Jose Eduardo Storopoli & Wonder Alexandre Luz Alves, 2022. "Scientific Contribution List Categories Investigation: a comparison between three mainstream medical journals," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(5), pages 2249-2276, May.
    20. Patelli, Aurelio & Napolitano, Lorenzo & Cimini, Giulio & Gabrielli, Andrea, 2023. "Geography of science: Competitiveness and inequality," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1).
    21. Abramo, Giovanni & D’Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea, 2015. "Evaluating university research: Same performance indicator, different rankings," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 9(3), pages 514-525.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C33 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Models with Panel Data; Spatio-temporal Models
    • I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education; Research Institutions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jis:ejistu:y:2025:i:02:id:567. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alina Popescu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/frasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.