IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jge/journl/1514.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Labor Productivity and Phillips Curve in China: Contemporary Investigation

Author

Listed:
  • Nahid Kalbasi Anaraki

Abstract

The Phillips curve on the trade-off between inflation and unemployment has been debated among economists for more than decades. Several studies have found that Phillips curve is dead in advanced economies and does not exist. Among others, Friedman (1968) stated that Phillips curve does not exist in the long-run because the relationship between inflation and unemployment is a temporary and short-term. On the contrary, Fuhrer (1995) found that Phillips curve is still alive in the United Kingdom; and Malinov and Sommers (1997) found that Phillips curve is still alive and stable in several OECD countries. This paper attempts to investigate whether a long-run Philips Curve exists in China. Using data for the period of 1987-2016 the estimated results of this study indicate that the Phillips curve, which existed during the late 1980s through 2000 in China has been gradually transformed to an almost vertical curve since 2000s, with a correlation of 0.8, indicating the importance of other policy variables including monetary policy and exchange rate regimes.

Suggested Citation

  • Nahid Kalbasi Anaraki, 2019. "Labor Productivity and Phillips Curve in China: Contemporary Investigation," Journal of Global Economy, Research Centre for Social Sciences,Mumbai, India, vol. 15(1), pages 37-48, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:jge:journl:1514
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.rcssindia.org/jge
    Download Restriction: Only to subscribers
    File URL: http://www.rcssindia.org
    Download Restriction: Not freely downloadable
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Phillips curve; productivity; unemployment rate; real wages; New-Keynesian model; Error Correction Model; Granger Causality Test.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D8 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty
    • I2 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jge:journl:1514. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr J K Sachdeva (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.rcssindia.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.