IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/rwe111/v10y2019i2p96-101.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison Between Conventional and Digital Essay Writing Assessment System: Consumer Concept and User Friendly

Author

Listed:
  • Adenan Ayob

Abstract

Significant changes occurred in education system; teaching and learning technology in this new era. The changes can be revised through the existence of digital assessment system for essay writing. In utilizing and interpreting these changes, this study was conducted to examine the use of digital and conventional assessment system for Form Three among Malay teachers. The survey method was used in this study. The samples of the study are 60 teachers of the national secondary school which taught Malay Language for form three in Selangor and Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur. The data are described descriptively and inferentially. Descriptive data are mean and standard deviation. Inferential data was analyzed using ANCOVA statistics. The findings show that there is a significant difference in teachers' opinion on the use of digital assessment system and the use of conventional assessment materials that based on consumer concept and user friendly. From that perspective, digital scoring system make teachers more dynamic in scoring the essay writing for form three. Therefore, it is recommended to the Ministry of Education to implement and revise the use of digital assessment system to improve the process for primary and secondary schools.

Suggested Citation

  • Adenan Ayob, 2019. "Comparison Between Conventional and Digital Essay Writing Assessment System: Consumer Concept and User Friendly," Research in World Economy, Research in World Economy, Sciedu Press, vol. 10(2), pages 96-101, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:jfr:rwe111:v:10:y:2019:i:2:p:96-101
    DOI: 10.5430/rwe.v10n2p96
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciedu.ca/journal/index.php/rwe/article/view/15877/9879
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.sciedu.ca/journal/index.php/rwe/article/view/15877
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5430/rwe.v10n2p96?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:rwe111:v:10:y:2019:i:2:p:96-101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gina Perry (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://rwe.sciedupress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.